://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-every-
other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use
in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-every-
other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
And you don't have 1080p available from the source? That wouldn't be
interlaced, methinks.
Thanks!
This is exactly what I needed!
just curious: why do you want to eliminate every second line of an image?
Video cameras interlace two images taken a fraction of a second
apart into a
I think 1080i is interlaced, 1080p is not.
Cheers,
Luis.
Stephen Barncard wrote:
And you don't have 1080p available from the source? That wouldn't be
interlaced, methinks.
Thanks!
This is exactly what I needed!
just curious: why do you want to eliminate every second line of an
This is correct.
i = interlaced
p = progressive
Many people shoot in non-interlaced modes nowadays, but some don't,
and there is legacy footage...
On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Luis wrote:
I think 1080i is interlaced, 1080p is not.
Cheers,
Luis.
Stephen Barncard wrote:
And you don't
://www.nabble.com/deleting-every-
other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-every-
other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-
every-other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
Here's one for the image processing gurus out there:
How difficult is it to take an image, and create a new image
containing every OTHER line from it (e.g., just the odd lines) so the
resulting picture is half the height?
Once you knew the width of the image, isn't it just a loop that
Why not use the Thumbnail Stack that Eric Chatonet has on his tutorial page?
Just use 1/2 * the Height and get a smoother jpg since you will be sampling
to get the smaller image.
No need for all the looping and slow pixel-by-pixel work.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
On 11/12/07 3:34 PM, BNig [EMAIL
:
http://www.nabble.com/deleting-every-other-line-in-an-image-tf4793676.html#a13716667
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
Le 13 nov. 07, à 01:05, Jim Ault a écrit :
Why not use the Thumbnail Stack that Eric Chatonet has on his tutorial
page?
Just use 1/2 * the Height and get a smoother jpg since you will be
sampling
to get the smaller image.
yes, but the downsizing is probably not performed by the
On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:32 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
Le 13 nov. 07, à 01:05, Jim Ault a écrit :
Why not use the Thumbnail Stack that Eric Chatonet has on his
tutorial page?
Just use 1/2 * the Height and get a smoother jpg since you will be
sampling
to get the smaller image.
yes, but
Le 13 nov. 07, à 01:50, Josh Mellicker a écrit :
Hi François,
Wow! I don't need those, but it is very impressive if you have
implemented those algorithms!
What I am hoping to do is simply throw away every other line and
construct a new image only consisting of every other line.
I wonder
On 11/12/07 4:50 PM, Josh Mellicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if there is a way to use some kind of crude nearest
neighbor resizing method where I can resize to 50%, that will not
blend the lines but just throw away every other one.
Wilhelm Sanke has an amazing set of image filters
You can try the resizequality property of an image:
set the resizequality of img 1 to best -- BILINEAR INTERPOLATION
set the resizequality of img 1 to normal -- NEAREST NEIGHBOR
On Nov 12, 2007 6:50 PM, Josh Mellicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if there is a way to use some kind of
16 matches
Mail list logo