Andrew,
As others said, your problem is probably with paths, which IDE
handles more automatically for you. Check out the startUp message. It
is sent when your standalone application starts and allows you to
accommodate the runtime differences between IDE and standalone.
Robert
. If I need to
clarify at all, please let me know.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Stacks-and-Standalones-tp1586282p1586282.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
I am trying to package up a little preview of my app so far for my
boss and
am running into a few large snags.
Saving as a stand alone (with all the guides I have been following)
mangles
the program and it crashes.
Stack runner 2.0 runs
I did not set the default folder. I will look this up in the dictionary right
away.
I tried the builder with both settings: individual and as they were. Neither
had any effect on how it performed.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Stacks-and-Standalones-tp1586282p1586349
though.
Executing at 11:49:36 AM on Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Type: value: can't find object
Object: stack libSQLYoga of stack C:/Rev/FOM2/main.rev
Line Num: 0
Hint: database key default was not found
Comments:
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Stacks-and-Standalones
On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
No change from the stand alone builder. I do get warnings telling me
that
libsql yoga couldn't be searched because it was password protected.
stack runner 2.0 runs a little bit better (still having a hard time
finding
handlers in TopMenu)
Andrew Kluthe wrote:
I am trying to package up a little preview of my app so far for my boss
and
am running into a few large snags.
Saving as a stand alone (with all the guides I have been following)
mangles
the program and it crashes.
Stack runner 2.0 runs the program mostly fine but it
file:
A question to the experienced:
The old 2.2.1 standalones have been #!/bin/sh encapsulated stack files and the
old decompile script from the list could decompile the stacks from the
standalones (the stacks stay password protected to be shure). The standalones
now seem to be changed
Hi Franz,
The format has changed, and to my knowlege there is not decompile
stack or script available for it. Sorry.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
Hi, all.
1. I'm working on a set of stacks which will provide quite a bit of
information, representing a kind of encyclopedic dictionary of an American
Indian language. I'm manipulating a lot of this info with various global
arrays, and I'm wondering what sorts of limits on memory I need to
10 matches
Mail list logo
