Looks like the src part of the distribution is
accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz.
For the same reasons that we removed the assemble tag form the bin
package, shouldn't we remove the project tag from the src package? This
also has implications as to whether we can just untar both the bin and src
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
Looks like the src part of the distribution is
accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz.
For the same reasons that we removed the assemble tag form the bin
package, shouldn't we remove the project tag from the src package? This
Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading these
messages 15 years from now.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
Looks like the src part of the distribution is
accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz.
For the same reasons that we
Let me clarify, I know the reference.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, David Medinets
david.medin...@gmail.comwrote:
Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading
these messages 15 years from now.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org
Christopher,
Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is
part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should
contain the time frame in which votes will be accepted. For us this is
typically 72 hours.
Billie
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:05 PM,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.comwrote:
Christopher,
Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is
part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should
contain the time frame in which votes will be
All I did was:
mvn release:prepare mvn release:perform
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Billie Rinaldi
billie.rina...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.com
wrote:
Christopher,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
All I did was:
mvn release:prepare mvn release:perform
Thanks! On another note, it looks like there's an .so file in
accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz (the same file in two places).
Billie
--
Christopher L Tubbs
I took a look at the binary tar, its sig and hashes looked good. I was
able to run accumulo from it w/ no problem and the apidocs were there!
Tried to run proxy from binary tarball, there was no proxy.properties or
proxy/README.
I diffed the src tarball w/ the tag and saw the following extra
Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris!
Adam
On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
So,
I've fixed the problem with the src tarball including binaries, and I
believe I've satisfied all the concerns regarding the naming
conventions.
I'm going to go ahead
Just trying to get consensus, so we can move forward. :)
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris!
Adam
On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, Christopher
1.5.0-RC3 for consideration.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-007/
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nexus Repository Manager ne...@repository.apache.org
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM
12 matches
Mail list logo