Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Fuchs
Looks like the src part of the distribution is accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. For the same reasons that we removed the assemble tag form the bin package, shouldn't we remove the project tag from the src package? This also has implications as to whether we can just untar both the bin and src

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote: Looks like the src part of the distribution is accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. For the same reasons that we removed the assemble tag form the bin package, shouldn't we remove the project tag from the src package? This

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread David Medinets
Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading these messages 15 years from now. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote: Looks like the src part of the distribution is accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. For the same reasons that we

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread David Medinets
Let me clarify, I know the reference. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, David Medinets david.medin...@gmail.comwrote: Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading these messages 15 years from now. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
Christopher, Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should contain the time frame in which votes will be accepted. For us this is typically 72 hours. Billie On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:05 PM,

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.comwrote: Christopher, Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should contain the time frame in which votes will be

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
All I did was: mvn release:prepare mvn release:perform -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.com wrote: Christopher,

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: All I did was: mvn release:prepare mvn release:perform Thanks! On another note, it looks like there's an .so file in accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz (the same file in two places). Billie -- Christopher L Tubbs

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Keith Turner
I took a look at the binary tar, its sig and hashes looked good. I was able to run accumulo from it w/ no problem and the apidocs were there! Tried to run proxy from binary tarball, there was no proxy.properties or proxy/README. I diffed the src tarball w/ the tag and saw the following extra

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Fuchs
Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris! Adam On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: So, I've fixed the problem with the src tarball including binaries, and I believe I've satisfied all the concerns regarding the naming conventions. I'm going to go ahead

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
Just trying to get consensus, so we can move forward. :) -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris! Adam On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, Christopher

[VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-16 Thread Christopher
1.5.0-RC3 for consideration. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-007/ -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- Forwarded message -- From: Nexus Repository Manager ne...@repository.apache.org Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM