Sounds good.
Just opened ACCUMULO-4684 for docs.
On 7/24/17 2:13 PM, Adam J. Shook wrote:
Thanks, Josh. As this is our stage cluster, we aren't too worried about
the missing data; I just want to clean up the metadata so the queue
looks better. I'll take the back-fill approach and see how
Thanks, Josh. As this is our stage cluster, we aren't too worried about
the missing data; I just want to clean up the metadata so the queue looks
better. I'll take the back-fill approach and see how that goes.
--Adam
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
On 7/24/17 1:44 PM, Adam J. Shook wrote:
We had some corrupt WAL blocks on our stage environment the other day
and opted to delete them. We not have some missing metadata and about
3k files pending for replication. I've dug into it a bit and noticed
that many of the WALs in the `order`
We had some corrupt WAL blocks on our stage environment the other day and
opted to delete them. We not have some missing metadata and about 3k files
pending for replication. I've dug into it a bit and noticed that many of
the WALs in the `order` queue of the replication table A) no longer exist