Re: Missing replication metadata

2017-07-24 Thread Josh Elser
Sounds good. Just opened ACCUMULO-4684 for docs. On 7/24/17 2:13 PM, Adam J. Shook wrote: Thanks, Josh.  As this is our stage cluster, we aren't too worried about the missing data; I just want to clean up the metadata so the queue looks better.  I'll take the back-fill approach and see how

Re: Missing replication metadata

2017-07-24 Thread Adam J. Shook
Thanks, Josh. As this is our stage cluster, we aren't too worried about the missing data; I just want to clean up the metadata so the queue looks better. I'll take the back-fill approach and see how that goes. --Adam On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >

Re: Missing replication metadata

2017-07-24 Thread Josh Elser
On 7/24/17 1:44 PM, Adam J. Shook wrote: We had some corrupt WAL blocks on our stage environment the other day and opted to delete them.  We not have some missing metadata and about 3k files pending for replication.  I've dug into it a bit and noticed that many of the WALs in the `order`

Missing replication metadata

2017-07-24 Thread Adam J. Shook
We had some corrupt WAL blocks on our stage environment the other day and opted to delete them. We not have some missing metadata and about 3k files pending for replication. I've dug into it a bit and noticed that many of the WALs in the `order` queue of the replication table A) no longer exist