Hi,
Jeremy is currently working on staging a release of a subset of Apache
Aries. I don't know if this include JNDI or not, but if it doesn't we still
need to wait for that to complete. So there is a chance of getting a new
release, but I can't give you an ETA right now.
Alasdair
On 25 October 2
Hi,
You should be able to find this information out from JIRA which is located
here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES
I think you probably want a filter something like this: project = ARIES AND
status = Resolved AND (fixVersion = "0.2" OR fixVersion = "0.3") ORDER BY
priority DESC
Thi
Matt,
This is the same question as the one you asked yesterday. A JIRA search for
'project = aries AND resolutiondate > "2010/05/26" AND resolutiondate <
"2011/02/14" ' (I'm not 100% sure of the 0.3 release date, but that's about
right) yields 239 issues. That's a lot to summarise.
Apache Aries 0.
Hi,
is there no chance for a new release of that bundle?
Kind Regards
Felix
Original Message
Subject:new release of aries jndi bundle
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:14:10 +0200
From: Felix Mayerhuber
Reply-To: user@aries.apache.org
To: user@aries.apache.org
Hello,
I have to build a case for going with Aries 0.3 + and not Aries 0.1. So far
I have found few issues already with 0.1.
I would like to have additional information on why I would recommend my
client to move to Aries 0.3 or 0.4. If some one can point me to a list of
issues and other informatio
Hi,
Am 24.10.2011 um 10:14 schrieb David Feliot:
> Hi,
>
> when defining a service property with a reference as a value, the property is
> assigned with a ServiceProxyWrapper (inner class of ReferenceRecipe).
>
> Here is the way it is defined:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would have ex
Hi,
Yesterday I created a Jira issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-765
I think my question is a bit philosophical so the mail list might be a
better place to ask it.
We are planning to release the first stable version of our opensource
libraries soon that implements the followi
I apologise for the confusion, I was under the impression that the service
properties element extended the map element, but apparently it doesn't. As such
it won't let you specify a value-type...
I suggest you raise a bug for the problem you're seeing. Whatever happens you
shouldn't end up wit
If the service is a String, then an exception is raised because the
String class is final:
org.apache.aries.proxy.FinalModifierException: The class
java.lang.String is final.
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ReferenceRecipe.internalCreate(ReferenceRecipe.java:98)
...
I
I think that what you're doing should work fine (assuming the service is
actually of type String) and this indcates a blueprint bug. If your service is
actually not a String then if you add a type of java.lang.String (to tell
blueprint to toString your object) things should probably work ok. Th
Hi Timothy,
Good point which is confirmed by that in the log. It could be
interesting that we display the message "Managed persistence context
support is now available ..." using logging LEVEL WARN to align info
that we have during shutdown of a bundle or a start
karaf@root> ld | grep -i 'context
Hi,
This probably means that you are shutting down your JPA runtime and there is no
longer any managed persistence support (i.e. you have stopped the aries JPA
container context bundle). That's the only time this message is issued.
Regards,
Tim
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:17:41 +0200
> Subj
My object is a String (a URI) that needs to be dynamically resolved as a
reference () and passed as a service property.
So if I correctly understood what you said, there's no way to do that
with blueprint?
It worked with Aries but it's only by chance, isn't it?
Thanks again,
Regards,
David
L
13 matches
Mail list logo
