On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Kenneth Knowles
wrote:
> Manu, I think your critique about user interface clarity is valid.
> CombineFn conflates a few operations and is not that clear about what it is
> doing or why. You seem to be concerned about CombineFn versus
>
I'm a bit confused here because neither of them requires same type of input
and output. Also, the Javadoc of Globally says "It is common for {@code *InputT
== OutputT}, but not required" *If associative and commutative is expected,
why don't they have restrictions like
Thanks guys. My original confusion comes from that if the API allows me to
have different types of input and output, why not make it easier. It's
clear now.
Do you think it's better to hide some interfaces we don't expect users to
use ? The Combine API has lured me a lot to do more than it
Manu, I think your critique about user interface clarity is valid.
CombineFn conflates a few operations and is not that clear about what it is
doing or why. You seem to be concerned about CombineFn versus
SerializableFunction constructors for the Combine family of transforms. I
thought I'd respond
GlobalCombineFn and PerKeyCombineFn still expect an associative and
commutative function when accumulating.
GlobalCombineFn is shorthand for assigning everything to a single key,
doing the combine, and then discarding the key and extracting the single
output.
PerKeyCombineFn is shorthand for doing
Hello Everyone,
I'm very pleased to announce that we just release a new version. Ideally,
you should just have to update your Maven POMs, update your code and be
good to go.
This is still very much a learning release where we are not releasing a
specific new feature set. Nevertheless, these are
Excellent!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I'm very pleased to announce that we just release a new version. Ideally,
> you should just have to update your Maven POMs, update your code and be
> good to go.
>
> This is still very
Hi Colleagues,Perhaps some of these questions should be asked in Flink forum.
Pls let me know if thats the case so I can post it there as well.
I am facing something new when running my Beam app in a 4 nodes Flink Cluster.I
list the behavior items:1- Dashboard shows all nodes actively running2-