er write latency.
try use the settings I pointed out above.
>
>
> 原始邮件
> *发件人:* li.penghui
> *收件人:* user
> *发送时间:* 2018年7月6日(周五) 17:56
> *主题:* Re: latency of bookkeeper
>
> Can I close the WAL if i can tolerate any enries lost. if WAL can be
> closed, i can use bookk
lose the WAL if i can tolerate any enries lost.
>
I am not sure what do you mean here.
>
> 原始邮件
> *发件人:* Enrico Olivelli
> *收件人:* user
> *发送时间:* 2018年7月6日(周五) 16:11
> *主题:* Re: latency of bookkeeper
>
> Hi (your name?),
> first step
> how does y
Can I close the WAL if i can tolerate any enries lost. if WAL can be closed, i
can use bookkeeper in different scenes.
原始邮件
发件人:Sijie guoguosi...@gmail.com
收件人:useru...@bookkeeper.apache.org
发送时间:2018年7月6日(周五) 16:11
主题:Re: latency of bookkeeper
I think your question is a bit not clear
Oh! Thanks.
journalMaxGroupWaitMSec=2
every addEntry request will wait this MSec?
Thanks. Thanks. Thanks. Thanks.
原始邮件
发件人:li.penghuili.peng...@zhaopin.com.cn
收件人:useru...@bookkeeper.apache.org
发送时间:2018年7月6日(周五) 17:56
主题:Re: latency of bookkeeper
Can I close the WAL if i can tolerate
But i should return the entry append success or fail for every entry.
Can I close the WAL if i can tolerate any enries lost.
原始邮件
发件人:Enrico olivellieolive...@gmail.com
收件人:useru...@bookkeeper.apache.org
发送时间:2018年7月6日(周五) 16:11
主题:Re: latency of bookkeeper
Hi (your name?),
first step
last entry (or after a
batch of X entries)
Cheers
Enrico
Il giorno ven 6 lug 2018 alle ore 08:46 li.peng...@zhaopin.com.cn <
li.peng...@zhaopin.com.cn> ha scritto:
>
> Hi
>
> I try to use bookkeeper. i care latency of write. so start a
>
on
replication to achieve durability.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/master/conf/bk_server.conf#L309
Hope this helps.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:46 PM li.peng...@zhaopin.com.cn <
li.peng...@zhaopin.com.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I try to use bookkeepe
