Hi,
Looks like I was premature in my response.
I had cause today to wipe my datastore and restart cassandra and reload the
.yaml containing the schema definition.
After doing a restart of my app which essentially inserted into a CF with a
2ndary idx and then queried that CF I was left with log f
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:48 PM, B. Todd Burruss wrote:
> i was actually doing this to start with and was worried that i could have
> two clients modifying schemas at the same time. it seems this could cause
> multiple valid versions and a race condition. maybe it simply "works out"
> that i wai
On 10/11/2010 06:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:53 PM, B. Todd Burruss wrote:
to determine if my programmatic schema changes have been distributed
throughout the cluster, I am supposed to use getSchemaVersionMap, correct?
my question is how do I properly use it? I h
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:53 PM, B. Todd Burruss wrote:
> to determine if my programmatic schema changes have been distributed
> throughout the cluster, I am supposed to use getSchemaVersionMap, correct?
>
> my question is how do I properly use it? I have the schema version returned
> from the t
to determine if my programmatic schema changes have been distributed
throughout the cluster, I am supposed to use getSchemaVersionMap, correct?
my question is how do I properly use it? I have the schema version
returned from the thrift method, and I can lookup in the schema map
returned getS
Sounds like your are getting this problem... http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg06295.htmlShould be fixed in the nightly build. You can still get the stats via JConsole. AaronOn 12 Oct, 2010,at 01:14 PM, Dmitri Smirnov wrote:Is below a normal thing? I am a newby, just unpacke
Is below a normal thing? I am a newby, just unpacked and started a
single node.
$ bin/nodetool -h localhost -p 8080 version
ReleaseVersion: 0.7.0-beta2
$ bin/nodetool -h localhost -p 8080 tpstats
Pool NameActive Pending Completed
MIGRATION_STAGE 0
Peter, you're my JVM GC hero!
Thank you!
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Peter Schuller <
peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote:
> > My motivation was that since I don't have too much data (10G each node)
> then
> > why don't I cache the hell out of it, so I started with a cache size of
> 100%
> >
Hi,
I've used range queries for Order Preserving Partition and got the
satisfactory results.
For instance, I can find first 1 million keys that starts with key
'2008010100' and ends with '2008010200'.
Now I'm trying to do the same with Random Partitioning. But here I find that
for Range r
> My motivation was that since I don't have too much data (10G each node) then
> why don't I cache the hell out of it, so I started with a cache size of 100%
> and a much larger heap size (started with 12G out of the 16G ram). Over time
> I've learned that too much heap for the JVM is like a kid in
Thanks Peter, Robert and Brandon.
So it seems that the only suspect by now is my excessive caching ;)
I'll get a better look at the GC activity next time shit starts to happen,
but in the mean time, as for the cache size (cassandra's internal cache),
it's row cache capacity is set to 10,000,000. I
No idea about a partial row cache, but I would start with fat rows in your use case. If you find that performance is really a problem then you could add a second "recent / oldest" CF that you maintain with the most recent entries and use the row cache there. OR add more nodes. AaronOn 12 Oct, 2010
Thanks for this reply. I'm wondering about the same issue... Should I bucket
things into Wide rows (say 10M rows), or narrow (say 10K or 100K)..
Of course it depends on my access patterns right...
Does anyone know if a partial row cache is a feasible feature to implement?
My use case is something
> 170141183460469231731687303715884105727
> 192.168.252.88Up 10.07 GB
Firstly, I second the point raised about the row cache size (very
frequent concurrent GC:s is definitely an indicator that the JVM heap
size is too small, and the row cache seems like a likely contender -
especially give
> I have wondered before whether there is any technical reason why the commit
> log replay should end with a flush, and from what I can tell, there isn't
> one other than the general goal of not having a large commit log. My
> personal feeling is that the last thing you want your production node do
On 10/11/10 7:13 AM, Ran Tavory wrote:
After a node gets restarted it compacts the sstable files on disk. I'm
not sure whether compactions always take place after restart, maybe
it's just minor compactions, I'm a little confused here, but my story
would work best if (major) compactions were al
El lun, 11-10-2010 a las 11:08 -0400, Edward Capriolo escribió:
Inlined:
> 2010/10/11 Héctor Izquierdo Seliva :
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > I'm sure this question or similar has come up before, but I can't find a
> > clear answer. I have to store a unknown number of items in cassandra,
> > which can
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Henry Luo wrote:
> We have an application that does a lot of updates to the rows. We use
> replication factor of 3 and are moving to multiple data centers. We would
> like to accomplish the following setup:
>
>
>
> Data are replicated to other data centers. RackAwa
2010/10/11 Héctor Izquierdo Seliva :
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm sure this question or similar has come up before, but I can't find a
> clear answer. I have to store a unknown number of items in cassandra,
> which can vary from a few hundreds to a few millions per customer.
>
> I read that in cassandra
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ran Tavory wrote:
> In my production cluster I've been seeing the following pattern.
> When a node goes up it operates smoothly for a few days but then, after a
> few days the node start to show excessive CPU usage, I see GC activity (and
> it may also be excessiv
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 16:34 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> This looks like you haven't set up the system to use the Sun JRE, yet.
> Debian/Ubuntu uses CGJ by default.
OpenJDK works fine as well (package openjdk-6-jre).
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
Hi everyone.
I'm sure this question or similar has come up before, but I can't find a
clear answer. I have to store a unknown number of items in cassandra,
which can vary from a few hundreds to a few millions per customer.
I read that in cassandra wide rows are better than a lot of rows, but
then
We have an application that does a lot of updates to the rows. We use
replication factor of 3 and are moving to multiple data centers. We would like
to accomplish the following setup:
Data are replicated to other data centers. RackAwareStrategy seems to be able
to handle that, however
1)
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:01, Arijit Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've just started reading about Cassandra and writing simple tests
> using Cassandra 0.6.5 to see if we can use it for our product.
>
> I have a data store with a set of columns, like C1, C2, C3, and C4,
> but the columns aren't m
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:41, Chen Xinli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a cassandra cluster of 6 nodes with RF=3, read-repair enabled,
> hinted handoff disabled, WRITE with QUORUM, READ with ONE.
> we want to rely on read-repair totally for node failure, as returning
> inconsistent result temporarily i
Matthew Dennis riptano.com> writes:
> Yes, please file it to Jira. It seems like it would be pretty useful for
various things and fairly easy to change the code to move it to another
directory whenever C* thinks it should be deleted...
Here it is for 0.6.4 version. Should work on a 0.6.5 as well
Just a follow on question to this - would PIG be a good fit for such questions?
Arijit
On 11 October 2010 14:31, Arijit Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've just started reading about Cassandra and writing simple tests
> using Cassandra 0.6.5 to see if we can use it for our product.
>
> I have a d
Hi All
I've just started reading about Cassandra and writing simple tests
using Cassandra 0.6.5 to see if we can use it for our product.
I have a data store with a set of columns, like C1, C2, C3, and C4,
but the columns aren't mandatory. For example, there can be a list of
(k.v) pairs with only
Hi,
We have a cassandra cluster of 6 nodes with RF=3, read-repair enabled,
hinted handoff disabled, WRITE with QUORUM, READ with ONE.
we want to rely on read-repair totally for node failure, as returning
inconsistent result temporarily is ok for us.
If a node is temporarily dead and returneded to
29 matches
Mail list logo
