I don't think that statement is accurate.
Which part ?
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 13/11/2012, at 6:31 AM, Binh Nguyen binhn...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that statement is accurate. The minor compaction is still
You can also kick off a user defined compaction via JMX.
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-1.1/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/CompactionManagerMBean.java#L58
This will allow you to compact big files, medium files, and teeny tinny little
files.
Cheers
While this solves the problem for an array of 'primitive' types. What if I
want an array or collection of an arbitrary type like listfoo, where foo is
a user defined type?
Do you mean a custom Cassandra data type that sub classes AbstractType? I dont
think CQL can support those, I may be
-Xmx2G -Xms512M -Xmn128M -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-Djava.rmi.server.hostname=10.10.0.211
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=7199
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:ParallelCMSThreads=4
On Nov 13, 2012, at 8:54 AM, aaron morton aa...@thelastpickle.com wrote:
I don't think that statement is accurate.
Which part ?
Probably this part:
After running a major compaction, automatic minor compactions are no longer
triggered, frequently requiring you to manually run major compactions
Correct
On Nov 13, 2012, at 5:21 AM, André Cruz andre.c...@co.sapo.pt wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 8:54 AM, aaron morton aa...@thelastpickle.com wrote:
I don't think that statement is accurate.
Which part ?
Probably this part:
After running a major compaction, automatic minor compactions
Sorry to be so slow but I am just learning CQL. Would this syntax be the
same for CREATE COLUMNFAMILY (as an aside what is a 'TABLE' in Cassandra)?
In other words is this valid:
CREATE COLUMNFAMILY Description (
If consistency is two, don't we just send data request to one and digest
request to another?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct. Which is one reason there is a separate setting for
cross-datacenter read repair, by the way.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012
My situation is that DC2 was not written to, thanks!
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jeremiah Jordan
jeremiah.jor...@gmail.comwrote:
If you have any data that you wrote to DC2, since the last time you ran
repair, you should probably run repair to make sure that data made it over
to DC1, if
I'm not completely sure what the latest Thrift behavior around this is
(it's never been great), but this is one of the things that cql3 is
designed to solve well. I would consider using cql3 if that's an option
for you.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Wei Zhu wz1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any
As far as I know, the row cache has never been populated by
get_range_slices(), only normal gets/multigets. The behavior is this way
because get_range_slices() is almost exclusively used to page over an
entire column family, which generally would not fit into the cache and
would simply a) ruin
thrift
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/introduction-to-composite-columns-part-1
thrift-to-cql3 http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Tyler Hobbs ty...@datastax.com wrote:
I'm not completely sure what the latest Thrift behavior around this is
(it's
I am new to Cassandra, and 1.1.6 is the only version I have tested. Not sure
about the old behavior, for 1.1.6, my observation is that for brand new cluster
(with no CF created), it shows Ownership from nodetool ring, the value
is 100/nodes. As soon as one CF is created, the column changes to
I have multiple servers that use individual cassandra cluster.
I would like to add a keyspace to store state information unique to each web
service.
Ideally I want to back up the keyspace that contains state information to a
local core cluster without having any information shared between the
Yes the row cache could be incorrect so on startup cassandra verify they
saved row cache by re reading. It takes a long time so do not save a big
row cache.
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Manu Zhang owenzhang1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a rowcache provieded by SerializingCacheProvider.
The data
I think the code base does not benefit from having too many different read
code paths. Logically what your suggesting is reasonable, but you have to
consider the case of one being slow to respond.
Then what?
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Manu Zhang owenzhang1...@gmail.com wrote:
If consistency
incorrect... what do you mean? I think it's only 15MB, which is not big.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes the row cache could be incorrect so on startup cassandra verify they
saved row cache by re reading. It takes a long time so do not save a
From my understanding, if CL = 2, one read, one digest are sent. Only if it
is read repair, digest is sent to all replicates.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on ATT
Original message
Subject: Re: Read during digest mismatch
From: Edward Capriolo
Thats correct
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Wz1975 wz1...@yahoo.com wrote:
From my understanding, if CL = 2, one read, one digest are sent. Only
if it isread repair, digest is sent to all replicates.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on ATT
Original
Have you tried using the defaults in cassandra-env.sh ? Your setting are very
different.
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-1.1/conf/cassandra-env.sh
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 13/11/2012, at 11:35
Minor compactions will still be triggered whenever a size tier gets 4+ sstables
(for the default compaction strategy). So it does not affect new data.
It just takes longer for the biggest size tier to get to 4 files. So it takes
longer to compact the big output from the major compaction.
Would this syntax be the same for CREATE COLUMNFAMILY (as an aside what is a
‘TABLE’ in Cassandra)?
Yes, CQL 2 uses COLUMN FAMILY or Table and CQL 3 uses TABLE
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql3-evolutions
In other words is this valid:
Does it work ? Is so it's valid.
Does the array
As soon as one CF is created, the column changes to Effective Ownership
There has to be a user defined keyspace to calculate effective ownership.
Effective Ownership is calculated for all keyspaces if the share the same RF,
and for a named KS if specified. It's the % of the total cluster data
Does the array have to be a KEY?
Sorry I don't understand this question.
In the samples you give you specify array as
CREATE COLUMNFAMILY Description (
PRIMARY_KEY
(vector_name, index),
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/LargeDataSetConsiderations
A negative side-effect of a large row-cache is start-up time. The
periodic saving of the row cache information only saves the keys that
are cached; the data has to be pre-fetched on start-up. On a large
data set, this is probably going
actually, I'm thinking about a bug or something
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/LargeDataSetConsiderations
A negative side-effect of a large row-cache is start-up time. The
periodic saving of the row cache
26 matches
Mail list logo
