Thanks! Tyler.
So how does it affects seeking operation?
I've seen for stables having some entries, next operation of seeking to
data file take lesser time however when entry is 0 it takes few
milliseconds..
On Jan 14, 2015 11:18 PM, "Tyler Hobbs" wrote:
> It's referring to an index of the cells
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Richard Dawe
wrote:
>
> I’ve been trying to find the Java code where the schema migration is
> sent to the other nodes in the cluster, to understand what the requirements
> are for successfully applying the update. E.g.: is QUORUM consistency level
> applied?
>
Hello,
I’m doing some research on schema migrations for Cassandra.
I’ve been playing with cqlsh with TRACING ON, and I can see that a schema
change like “CREATE TABLE” is sent to all nodes in the cluster. And also that
“CREATE TABLE” fails if only one of my three nodes is up (with replication
On 01/14/2015 02:49 PM, Mulert, Bill wrote:
Although I have not seen any documentation that says one cannot do this,
version 2.1.2 is complaining about defining one.
CREATE TYPE wdm.thing (
thing_name _text_,
…
CREATE TABLE wdm.ctins (
foo_no
Although I have not seen any documentation that says one cannot do this,
version 2.1.2 is complaining about defining one.
CREATE TYPE wdm.thing (
thing_name text,
...
CREATE TABLE wdm.ctins (
foo_no text,
item
Hi,
We are running an Old version of Cassandra 0.7.4 on Windows
At one point, the average read times is 2.1 seconds when SCOM (System
Center Operation Manager) is running, and 0.04 seconds when its disabled.
The problem is we CANNOT disable SCOM on these Windows VMs.
Any have seen this before? exp
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jens Rantil wrote:
> I just recently put together a small script to count the number of
> tombstones grouped by partition id, for one or multiple sstables:
>
https://github.com/cloudian/support-tools
Has "checksstablegarbage" which does a similar thing without
It's referring to an index of the cells within the partition (in a single
sstable). It can have zero entries when there are very few cells in the
partition.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:48 AM, nitin padalia
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While Tracing is on, we see a trace message,
> Partition index with entri
Nice, thanks Jens
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Jens Rantil wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just recently put together a small script to count the number of
> tombstones grouped by partition id, for one or multiple sstables:
>
> https://gist.github.com/JensRantil/063b7c56ca4a8dfe1c50
>
> I needed this
Hi all
I just recently put together a small script to count the number of tombstones
grouped by partition id, for one or multiple sstables:
https://gist.github.com/JensRantil/063b7c56ca4a8dfe1c50
I needed this for debugging purposes and thought I’d share it with you guys in
case anyone is
Hi,
While Tracing is on, we see a trace message,
Partition index with entries found for sstable
What does it actually means?
Does it mean in 'Partion Index' file has X partion key:offset entries
for SSTable Y? If so then when could X be 0?
--
Nitin Padalia
Hi ,
I have checked http://cassandra.apache.org The latest release is 2.1.2 .Do you
know when will The 3.0 release be available?
Thanks in advance
-Orijinal İleti-
Kimden: "Jonathan Haddad"
Gönderme tarihi: 13.1.2015 16:26
Kime: "user@cassandra.apache.org"
Konu: Re: Storing PDF data
12 matches
Mail list logo