Running java7u72 with c* 1.1 with no issues.. yet (hope not) :) Jason
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:39 AM, <sean_r_dur...@homedepot.com> wrote: > I have run plenty of 1.2.x Cassandra versions on the Oracle JVM 1.7. I > have used both 1.7.0_40 and 1.7.0_72 with no issues. Also have 3.2.7 DSE > running on 1.7.0_72 in PR with no issues. > > > > > > Sean Durity – Cassandra Admin, Big Data Team > > To engage the team, create a request > <https://portal.homedepot.com/sites/bigdata/SitePages/Big%20Data%20Engagement%20Request.aspx> > > > > *From:* cass savy [mailto:casss...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 1:22 PM > *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org > *Subject:* C*1.2 on JVM 1.7 > > > > > > > > Has anybody run DSE 3.2.6(C*1.2.16) on JRE 1.7. I know its recommended > that we have to get to JVM version 7 to get to C*2.0 and higher. > > > > We are experiencing latency issues during rolling upgrade from 1.2 to 2.0. > Hence cannot get o C*1.2, but plan to just upgrade JRE from 1.6 to 1.7. I > wanted to know if anyof you have C*1.2 on JRE 1.7 in PROD and have run into > issues. > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be > taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed > to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject > to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home > Depot terms of business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot > disclaims all responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of > this attachment and for any damages or losses arising from any > inaccuracies, errors, viruses, e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other > items of a destructive nature, which may be contained in this attachment > and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, consequential or special > damages in connection with this e-mail message or its attachment. >
