Sounds like a promising step forward. I’d certainly like to know when the blog
posts are up.
Kenneth Brotman
From: Matt Stump [mailto:mrevilgn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 7:56 AM
To: user
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on automated root-cause system
For some
Hi Ayub,
The counting of tombstones is sort of involved. The JIRA tickets contain the
discussions and where things are at. Several tickets to study. Maybe start
with CASSANDRA-14149: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14149 and
follow the discussions back to previous
Given your data model, there’s two ways you may read a tombstone:
You select an expired row, or you scan the whole table.
If you select an expired row, you’re going to scan one tombstone. With
sufficiently high read rate, that’ll look like you’re scanning a lot - each
read will add one to the
Thanks Jeff. I'm trying to figure out why the tombstones scans are
happening if possible eliminate it.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 10:50 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> G1GC with an 8g heap may be slower than CMS. Also you don’t typically set
> new gen size on G1.
>
> Again though - what problem are you
