Re: re-add column with same UDT fail

2019-11-21 Thread Andrew Prudhomme
It looks like there are a couple of things going on here. The type check when adding a UDT column: new_type.isValueCompatibleWith(dropped_type) will only be true if the dropped type is a UDT. This however will never be the case, since UDT types are replaced with tuple when converted to a dropped

Find large partition https://github.com/tolbertam/sstable-tools

2019-11-21 Thread Sergio Bilello
Hi guys! Just for curiosity do you know anything beside https://github.com/tolbertam/sstable-tools to find a large partition? Best, Sergio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: re-add column with same UDT fail

2019-11-21 Thread Nitan Kainth
I have seen this situation causing corruption due to different structure but same name column in old and new sstables. Regards, Nitan Cell: 510 449 9629 > On Nov 21, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Tommy Stendahl > wrote: > >  > Hi, > > I run in to problem with 3.11.5, I think its related to "* Toughen

re-add column with same UDT fail

2019-11-21 Thread Tommy Stendahl
Hi, I run in to problem with 3.11.5, I think its related to "* Toughen up column drop/recreate type validations (CASSANDRA-15204)" I have a user defined type and I have a table with a column that has this UDF as type, if I drop the column and recreate it with the same name it fails. I think