On 12/8/2010 7:30 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Full DEBUG level logs would be a space problem; I'm loading at least 1T
per node (after 3x replication), and these events are rare. Can the
DEBUG logs be limited to the specific
which is fixed in
rc2.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running a big test -- ten nodes with 3T disk each. I'm using
0.7.0rc1. After some tuning help (thanks Tyler) lots of this is working
as it should. However a serious event occurred as well
are rare. Can the
DEBUG logs be limited to the specific modules helpful for this diagnosis
of the gossip problem and, secondarily, the failure to report
replication failure?
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm afraid that's
I'm running a big test -- ten nodes with 3T disk each. I'm using
0.7.0rc1. After some tuning help (thanks Tyler) lots of this is working
as it should. However a serious event occurred as well -- the server
froze up -- and though mutations were dropped, no error was reported to
the client.
Did I answer the question sufficiently? I need repair to work, and the
cluster is sick.
On 11/14/2010 2:17 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
What exception is causing it to fail/retry?
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Chip Salzenberg rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
My by-now infamous eight-node cluster
On 11/15/2010 11:34 AM, Rob Coli wrote:
On 11/13/10 11:59 AM, Reverend Chip wrote:
Swapping could conceivably be a
factor; the JVM is 32G out of 72G, but the machine is 2.5G into swap
anyway. I'm going to disable swap and see if the gossip issues resolve.
Are you using JNA/memlock
On 11/15/2010 12:09 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I find X.21's data disk is full. nodetool ring says that X.21 has a
load of only 326.2 GB, but the 1T partition is full.
Load only tracks live data -- is the rest tmp files
On 11/15/2010 2:01 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a lot of non-tmps that were not included in the load
figure. Having stopped the server and deleted tmp files, the data are
still using way more space than ring
On 11/12/2010 6:46 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Chip Salzenberg rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
After I rebooted my 0.7.0beta3+ cluster to increase threads (read=100
write=200 ... they're beefy machines), and putting them under load again, I
find gossip reporting yoyo
and target
- DEBUG level logs
- instructions for how to reproduce
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running tests with a first four-node, then eight-node
cluster. I started with 0.7.0 beta3, but have since updated to a more
recent Hudson
On 11/6/2010 8:26 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Reverend Chip rev.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I to understand that
ring maintenance requests can just fail when partially complete, in the
same manner as a regular insert might fail, perhaps due to inter-node
RPC
11 matches
Mail list logo
