Re: 2014 nosql benchmark

2014-12-19 Thread Philo Yang
Today I've also seen this benchmark in Chinese websites. "SequoiaDB" seems come from a Chinese startup company, and in db-engines ranking it's score is 0.00. So IMO I have to say I think this benchmark is a "soft sell". They compare three databases, two written by

Re: 2014 nosql benchmark

2014-12-18 Thread Wilm Schumacher
Hi, I'm always interessted in such benchmark experiments, because the databases evolve so fast, that the race is always open and there is a lot motion in there. And of course I askes myself the same question. And I think that this publication is unreliable. For 4 reasons (from reading very fast,

2014 nosql benchmark

2014-12-18 Thread diwayou
i just have read this benchmark pdf, does anyone have some opinion about this? i think it's not fair about cassandra url:http://www.bankmark.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/bankmark-20141201-WP-NoSQLBenchmark.pdf‍ http://msrg.utoronto.ca/papers/NoSQLBenchmark‍