I agree with Jeff. I believe the _best_ part of Cassandra exists in its
networking , replication , and fault tolerance. The storage engine is as dumb
as disk or memory. If we can make it fast by replacing it , great. Maybe even
optimize it in JVM.
With new paradigms like blockchain entering
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Carl Mueller
wrote:
> Rocksandra can expand out it's non-java footprint without rearchitecting
> the java codebase. Or are there serious concerns with Datastax and the
> binary protocols?
>
>
Rockssandra should eventually become
Again, I'd really like to get a feel for scylla vs rocksandra vs cassandra.
Isn't the driver binary protocol the easiest / least redesign level of
storage engine swapping? Scylla and Cassandra and Rocksandra are currently
three options. Rocksandra can expand out it's non-java footprint without
It’s an interesting conversation. For more details about the pluggable
storage engine here is the link.
Blog:
https://thenewstack.io/instagram-supercharges-cassandra-pluggable-rocksdb-storage-engine/
JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/CASSANDRA-13475
On Tue, Mar
Just released on DataStax Distributed Data Show, DiKang Gu of Instagram
interviewed by author Jeff Carpenter.
Found it really interesting: Shadow clustering, migrating from 2.2 to 3.0,
using the Rocks DB as a pluggable storage engine for Cassandra