Re: Nodetool tablehistograms

2017-07-19 Thread Chris Lohfink
Its the number of sstables that may of been read from. This includes sstables who had their bloom filters checked (which may hit disk). This changes a bit in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13120 to be only the sstables that its actually reading from. On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at

Nodetool tablehistograms

2017-07-19 Thread Abhinav Solan
Hi Everyone, Here is the result of my tablehistograms command on one of our tables. Percentile SSTables Write Latency Read LatencyPartition Size Cell Count (micros) (micros) (bytes) 50% 4.00 73.46

Re: partition sizes reported by nodetool tablehistograms

2017-02-24 Thread Chris Lohfink
24, 2017 at 4:53 PM, John Sanda <john.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am working on some issues involving really big partitions. I have been > making extensive use of nodetool tablehistograms. What exactly is the > partition size being reported? I have a table for which the max v

partition sizes reported by nodetool tablehistograms

2017-02-24 Thread John Sanda
I am working on some issues involving really big partitions. I have been making extensive use of nodetool tablehistograms. What exactly is the partition size being reported? I have a table for which the max value reported is about 3.5 GB, but running du -h against the table data directory reports