you got it! that's what I was looking for from that part of my question.
thanks!!
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:08 PM, DE VITO Dominique <
dominique.dev...@thalesgroup.com> wrote:
> Ø I keep hearing that the minimum number of Cassandra nodes required to
> achieve Quorum consensus is 4 I wonder
Ø I keep hearing that the minimum number of Cassandra nodes required to
achieve Quorum consensus is 4 I wonder why not 3? In fact, many container
deployments by default seem to deploy 4 nodes. Can anyone shine some light on
this?
I think it may be due to the following (note : I am assuming,
Thanks! got it!
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Max C wrote:
> As Matija mentioned, quorum is RF / 2 + 1:
>
> RF=1, Quorum = 1
> RF=2, Quorum = 2
> RF=3, Quorum = 2
> RF=4, Quorum = 3
> RF=5, Quorum = 3
> RF=6, Quorum = 4
> RF=7, Quorum = 4
>
> So no, you don’t have to
As Matija mentioned, quorum is RF / 2 + 1:
RF=1, Quorum = 1
RF=2, Quorum = 2
RF=3, Quorum = 2
RF=4, Quorum = 3
RF=5, Quorum = 3
RF=6, Quorum = 4
RF=7, Quorum = 4
So no, you don’t have to have an odd RF to achieve a quorum, as you see above.
Most people use RF=3 with a minimum of 3 nodes,
@Matjia I think you either did not understand my question or I failed to
explain it more clearly.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Matija Gobec wrote:
> QUORUM is by documentation:
>
> quorum = (sum_of_replication_factors / 2) + 1
>
> Its not fixed value (as 4).
>
> On
QUORUM is by documentation:
quorum = (sum_of_replication_factors / 2) + 1
Its not fixed value (as 4).
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Kant Kodali wrote:
> I keep hearing that the minimum number of Cassandra nodes required to
> achieve Quorum consensus is 4 I wonder why