Thanks for the reply Rob.
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:46:52 -0700
Subject: Re: validation compaction
From: rc...@eventbrite.com
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:41 AM, S C wrote:
Bob,
Bob is my father's name. Unless you need a gastrointestinal consult, you
pro
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:41 AM, S C wrote:
> Bob,
>
Bob is my father's name. Unless you need a gastrointestinal consult, you
probably don't want to ask "Bob Coli" a question... ;P
> Default compression is Snappy compression and I have seen compression
> ranging between 2-4% (just as the doc s
...@outlook.com
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: validation compaction
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:09:14 -0500
Thanks Rob.
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:42:39 -0700
Subject: Re: validation compaction
From: rc...@eventbrite.com
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:04 PM, S
Thanks Rob.
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:42:39 -0700
Subject: Re: validation compaction
From: rc...@eventbrite.com
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:04 PM, S C wrote:
I have started repairing a 10 node cluster with one of the table having > 1TB
of data. I notice t
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:04 PM, S C wrote:
> I have started repairing a 10 node cluster with one of the table having >
> 1TB of data. I notice that the validation compaction actually shows >3 TB
> in the "nodetool compactionstats" bytes total. However, I have less than
> 1TB data on the machine.
