On 6/22/2011 8:20 PM, mcasandra wrote:
Well it depends on the requirements. If you use any combination of CL with
EACH_QUORUM it means you are accepting the fact that you are ok if one of
the DC is down. And in your scenario you care more about DCs being
consistent even if writes were to fail. Al
Well it depends on the requirements. If you use any combination of CL with
EACH_QUORUM it means you are accepting the fact that you are ok if one of
the DC is down. And in your scenario you care more about DCs being
consistent even if writes were to fail. Also you are ok with network
latency.
I th
On 6/22/2011 6:50 PM, AJ wrote:
On 6/22/2011 5:56 PM, mcasandra wrote:
LOCAL_QUORUM gurantees consistency in the local data center only. Other
replica nodes in the same DC and other DC not part of the QUORUM will be
eventually consistent. If you want to ensure consistency accross DCs
you can
us
On 6/22/2011 5:56 PM, mcasandra wrote:
LOCAL_QUORUM gurantees consistency in the local data center only. Other
replica nodes in the same DC and other DC not part of the QUORUM will be
eventually consistent. If you want to ensure consistency accross DCs you can
use EACH_QUORUM but keep in mind the
LOCAL_QUORUM gurantees consistency in the local data center only. Other
replica nodes in the same DC and other DC not part of the QUORUM will be
eventually consistent. If you want to ensure consistency accross DCs you can
use EACH_QUORUM but keep in mind the latency involved assuming DCs are not
lo
