Cool thanks, I think I will experiment with nodetool move.
Can somebody confirm on the reason for decommissioning, instead of just
splitting the token on the fly? Yes it does seem simpler to just
decommission and bootstrap, but that does mean a lot of data has to be moved
around to get a reasonab
Yes, imo, it should be renamed.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Bill Au wrote:
> If nodetool loadbalance does not do what it's name implies, should it be
> renamed or maybe even remove altogether since the recommendation is to
> _never_ use it in production?
>
> Bill
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6
If nodetool loadbalance does not do what it's name implies, should it be
renamed or maybe even remove altogether since the recommendation is to
_never_ use it in production?
Bill
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:41 AM, aaron morton wrote:
> This comment from Ben Black may help...
>
> "I recommend you _n
This comment from Ben Black may help...
"I recommend you _never_ use nodetool loadbalance in production because
it will _not_ result in balanced load. The correct process is manual
calculation of tokens (the algorithm for RP is on the Operations wiki
page) and nodetool move.
"
http://www.mail-arc
