Ah, now I understand. Supercolumns it is.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I don't think you are missing anything. You'll have to pick your poison.
>
> FWIW, if each BAR has relatively few fields then supercolumns aren't
> bad. It's when a BAR has dynamically growing nu
I don't think you are missing anything. You'll have to pick your poison.
FWIW, if each BAR has relatively few fields then supercolumns aren't
bad. It's when a BAR has dynamically growing numbers of fields
(subcolumns) that you get in trouble with that model.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jon
