it
completely depends on your model, your infrastructure, your services (CS,
Memcache, Hazelcast, whatsoever), your demands on availability,
consistency, latency and so on.
There is no wrong or false.
Maybe you get 50% better performance with a Memcache in front of CS, or you
just use ScyllaDB and
un, but that's not what it was designed for.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:22 AM, KARR, DAVID wrote:
> No, I haven’t “thought why people don’t use Cassandra as a cache”, that’s
> why I’m asking this here. I’m asking the community for their POV when it
> might make sense to front Cassa
No, I haven’t “thought why people don’t use Cassandra as a cache”, that’s why
I’m asking this here. I’m asking the community for their POV when it might
make sense to front Cassandra with Hazelcast. This is even mentioned as a use
case in the Hazelcast documentation (“As a front layer for a
put a cache in front of a cache?
>
>
>
> *From:* Dorian Hoxha [mailto:dorian.ho...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:52 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Rationale for using Hazelcast in front of Cassandra?
>
>
>
> Maybe when you can
?
From: Dorian Hoxha [mailto:dorian.ho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:52 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationale for using Hazelcast in front of Cassandra?
Maybe when you can have very hot keys that can give trouble to your
3(replication) cassandra nodes
briefly describe using Hazelcast as a "front-end"
> for Cassandra, perhaps as a cache. This seems counterintuitive to me. Can
> someone describe to me when this kind of architecture might make sense?
>
I've seen use cases that briefly describe using Hazelcast as a "front-end" for
Cassandra, perhaps as a cache. This seems counterintuitive to me. Can someone
describe to me when this kind of architecture might make sense?
How about KeptCollections (backs by ZooKeeper)?
https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections
Thanks,
Mubarak
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Germán Kondolf
wrote:
> I don't know much about Zookeeper, but as far as I read, it is out of
> JVM process.
> Hazelcast is just a framewo
As far as I know they are adding a clusterized semaphore on next version.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Germán Kondolf wrote:
> I don't know much about Zookeeper, but as far as I read, it is out of
> JVM process.
> Hazelcast is just a framework and you can programmatic
I don't know much about Zookeeper, but as far as I read, it is out of
JVM process.
Hazelcast is just a framework and you can programmatically start and
shutdown the cluster, it's just an xml to configure it.
Hazelcast also provides good caching features to integrate with
Hibernate, d
thx for the feedback. regarding locking, has anyone done a comparison
to zookeeper? does zookeeper provide functionality over hazelcast?
On 12/10/2010 11:08 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi there,
I'm not using it atm but plan to in my next project. It really looks nice :)
Bye,
Norman
20
urruss wrote:
>> http://www.hazelcast.com/product.jsp
>>
>> has anyone tested hazelcast as a distributed locking mechanism for java
>> clients? seems very attractive on the surface.
>>
>
witter.com/germanklf
http://ar.linkedin.com/in/germankondolf
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, B. Todd Burruss wrote:
> http://www.hazelcast.com/product.jsp
>
> has anyone tested hazelcast as a distributed locking mechanism for java
> clients? seems very attractive on the surface.
>
http://www.hazelcast.com/product.jsp
has anyone tested hazelcast as a distributed locking mechanism for java
clients? seems very attractive on the surface.
14 matches
Mail list logo
