> Is it not possible to include a column in both the set clause and in the
> where clause?
No it's not. Or rather in that case what is not supported is the use
of secondary indexes in update where clauses. But if 'locked' is
indeed not part of your primary key, then at least the error message
suc
What is the CF schema ?
> Is it not possible to include a column in both the set clause and in the
> where clause? And if it is not possible, how come?
Not sure.
Looks like you are looking for a conditional update here. You know the row is
at ID 1 and you only want to update if locked = 'fal
I am using CQL 3 and trying to execute the following,
UPDATE CHANGELOGLOCK SET LOCKED = 'true', LOCKEDBY = '10.11.8.242
(10.11.8.242)', LOCKGRANTED = '2012-10-05 16:58:01' WHERE ID = 1 AND LOCKED
= 'false';
It gives me the error, Bad Request: PRIMARY KEY part locked found in SET
part. The primar
