Thanks Jonathan.
After looking at the Lucandra code I realized my confusions has to do with
get_range_slices
and the RandomPartitioner. When I switched to the OPP I got the expected
behaviour.
I was noticing cases under the random partitioner where keys I expected to
be returned
were not.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, aaron aa...@thelastpickle.com wrote:
I was noticing cases under the random partitioner where keys I expected to
be returned
were not. Can you give a little advice on the expected behaviour of
get_range_slices
with the RP and I'll try to write a JUnit for it.
Util.range returns a Range object which is end-exclusive. (You want
Bounds for end-inclusive.)
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:19 AM, aaron morton aa...@thelastpickle.com wrote:
He there, I'm still getting odd behavior with get_range_slices. I've created
a JUNIT test that illustrates the case.
Could
He there, I'm still getting odd behavior with get_range_slices. I've
created a JUNIT test that illustrates the case.
Could someone take a look and either let me know where my
understanding is wrong or is this is a real issue?
I added the following to ColumnFamilyStoreTest.java
private
I've broken this case down further to some pyton code that works against
the thrift generated
client and am still getting the same odd results. With keys obejct1,
object2 and object3 an
open ended get_range_slice starting with object1 only returns object1 and
2.
I'm guessing that I've got
