Hi,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:36, Mck m...@apache.org wrote:
It's available here: http://pastebin.com/hhrr8m9P (for version 0.7.8)
I'm interested in this patch and see it's usefulness but no one will act
until you attach it to an issue. (I think a new issue is appropriate
here).
I'm glad
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 08:20 +0200, Patrik Modesto wrote:
As Jonathan
already explained himself: ignoring unavailable ranges is a
misfeature, imo
Generally it's not what one would want i think.
But I can see the case when data is to be treated volatile and ignoring
unavailable ranges may be
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:52 PM, David Hawthorne dha...@gmx.3crowd.com wrote:
I'm curious... digging through the source, it looks like replicate on write
triggers a read of the entire row, and not just the columns/supercolumns that
are affected by the counter update. Is this the case? It
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:54, Mick Semb Wever m...@apache.org wrote:
Patrik: is it possible to describe the use-case you have here?
Sure.
We use Cassandra as a storage for web-pages, we store the HTML, all
URLs that has the same HTML data and some computed data. We run Hadoop
MR jobs to compute
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:11 AM, hiroyuki.watan...@barclayscapital.com wrote:
Yes, I see files with name like
Orders-g-6517-Compacted
However, all of those file have a size of 0.
Starting from Monday to Thurseday we have 5642 files for -Data.db,
-Filter.db and Statistics.db and only
That's interesting. I did an experiment wherein I added some entropy to the
row name based on the time when the increment came in, (e.g. row = row + / +
(timestamp - (timestamp % 300))) and now not only is the load (in GB) on my
cluster more balanced, the performance has not decayed and has
Hi All,
I started using SSTableSimpleUnsortedWriter to load data, and my data
has a few rows but a lot of column name in each rows.
I call SSTableSimpleUnsortedWriter.newRow every 10'000 columns inserted.
But the time taken to insert columns is increasing as the column
family is increasing. The
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Benoit Perroud ben...@noisette.ch wrote:
Hi All,
I started using SSTableSimpleUnsortedWriter to load data, and my data
has a few rows but a lot of column name in each rows.
I call SSTableSimpleUnsortedWriter.newRow every 10'000 columns inserted.
But the
Thanks for your answer.
2011/9/2 Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Benoit Perroud ben...@noisette.ch wrote:
Hi All,
I started using SSTableSimpleUnsortedWriter to load data, and my data
has a few rows but a lot of column name in each rows.
I call
Thats brilliant, thanks.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, cli show schema in 0.8.4+
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:52 PM, J T jt4websi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm probably being blind .. but I can't see any way to dump the schema
definition
The Thrift API is not going anywhere any time soon.
I'm not aware of anyone working on an erlang CQL client.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:39 AM, J T jt4websi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm a fan of erlang, and have been using successive cassandra versions via
the erlang thrift interface for a
I see. Thank you for helpful information
Yuki
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Lebresne [mailto:sylv...@datastax.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:40 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removal of old data files
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:11 AM,
Hi,
I am looking for information/tutorials on the use of composite columns,
including how to use it, what kind of indexing it can offer, and its
advantage over super columns. I googled but came up with very little
information. There is a blog article from high performance cassandra on the
Ok, thats good to know.
If push came to shove I could probably write such a client myself after
doing the necessary research but I'd prefer to save myself the hassle.
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
The Thrift API is not going anywhere any time
I cant find way how to remove all columns definitions without CF
import/export.
[default@int4] update column family sipdb with column_metadata = [];
Syntax error at position 51: required (...)+ loop did not match anything
at input ']'
[default@int4] update column family sipdb with
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ian Danforth idanfo...@numenta.com wrote:
Does this scale with multiples of the replication factor or directly
with number of nodes? Or more succinctly, to double the writes per
second into the cluster how many more nodes would I need?
The write throughput
Is this 0.8.4?
2011/9/2 Radim Kolar h...@sendmail.cz:
I cant find way how to remove all columns definitions without CF
import/export.
[default@int4] update column family sipdb with column_metadata = [];
Syntax error at position 51: required (...)+ loop did not match anything at
input ']'
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Yiming Sun yiming@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for information/tutorials on the use of composite columns,
including how to use it, what kind of indexing it can offer, and its
advantage over super columns. I googled but came up with very little
Thanks Edward. What's the link to your blog?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Yiming Sun yiming@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for information/tutorials on the use of composite columns,
including how to
Is this 0.8.4?
yes
Hey,
Currently I'm running Cassandra on Ubuntu 10.4 x86_64 in EC2.
I'm wondering if anyone observed a better performance / stability on other
distros ( CentOS / RHEL / ...) or OS (eg. Solaris intel/SPARC) ?
Is anyone running prod on VMs, not cloud, but ESXi or Solaris zones ? Is
there love
Then you'll want to create an issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Radim Kolar h...@sendmail.cz wrote:
Is this 0.8.4?
yes
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra
We moved off of ubuntu because of kernel issues in the AMIs we found in 10.04
and 10.10 in ec2. So we're now on debian squeeze with ext4. It's been great
for us.
One thing that bit us is we'd been using property file snitch and the
availability zones as racks and had an equal number of nodes
So.
You have created keyspace with SimpleStrategy.
If you want to use *LOCAL_QUORUM, *you should create keyspace (or change
existing) with NetworkTopologyStrategy.
I have provided CLI examples on how to do it. If you are creating keyspace
from Hector, you have to do same via Java API.
Evgeny.
That ticket explains a lot, looking forward to a resolution on it.
(Sorry I don't have a patch to offer)
Ian
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:52 PM, David Hawthorne dha...@gmx.3crowd.com wrote:
I'm curious... digging through
Okay, great I just wanted to confirm that LOCAL_QUORUM will not work with
SimpleStrategy. There was somewhat of a debate amongst my devs that said it
should work.
Anthon
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Evgeniy Ryabitskiy
evgeniy.ryabits...@wikimart.ru wrote:
So.
You have created keyspace
I've graphed the rate of change of the TotalReadLatencyMicros counter over the
last 12 hours, and divided by 1,000,000 to get it in seconds. I'm grabbing it
every 10 seconds, so I divided by another 10 to get per-second rates.
The result is that I have a CF doing 10 seconds of read *every
Hello,
I have one node of a cluster that is stuck in a streaming out state
sending to the node that is being repaired.
If I looked the AE Thread in jconsole I see this trace:
Name: AE-SERVICE-STAGE:1
State: WAITING on java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync@7e3e0044
Total blocked: 0 Total waited:
Instead of empty strings, try Character.[MAX|MIN-]_VALUE.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Anthony Ikeda
anthony.ikeda@gmail.com wrote:
My Column name is of Composite(TimeUUIDType, UTF8Type) and I can query
across the TimeUUIDs correctly, but now I want to also range across the UTF8
Note that this is an implementation detail, not something that
inherently can't work with other strategies. LOCAL_QUORUM and
EACH_QUORUM are logically equivalent to QUORUM when there is a single
datacenter.
We tried briefly to add support for non-NTS strategies in
Does it always pick the node with the lowest IP address? All of my hosts are
in the same /24. The fourth node in the 5 node cluster has the lowest value in
the 4th octet (54). I erased the cluster and rebuilt it from scratch as a 3
node cluster using the first 3 nodes, and now the
It looks like you only have 2 replicas configured in each data center?
If so, LOCAL_QUORUM cannot be achieved with a host down same as with
QUORUM on RF=2 in a single DC cluster.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Oleg Tsvinev oleg.tsvi...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe I don't quite understand
Well, this is the part I don't understand then. I thought that if I
configure 2 replicas with 3 nodes and one of 3 nodes goes down, I'll
still have 2 nodes to store 3 replicas. Is my logic flawed somehere?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Nate McCall n...@datastax.com wrote:
It looks like you
from http://www.datastax.com/docs/0.8/consistency/index:
A “quorum” of replicas is essentially a majority of replicas, or RF /
2 + 1 with any resulting fractions rounded down.
I have RF=2, so majority of replicas is 2/2+1=2 which I have after 3rd
node goes down?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:22 PM,
In your options, you have configured 2 replicas for each data center:
Options: [DC2:2, DC1:2]
If one of those replicas is down, then LOCAL_QUORUM will fail as there
is only one replica left 'locally.'
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Oleg Tsvinev oleg.tsvi...@gmail.com wrote:
from
Do you mean I need to configure 3 replicas in each DC and keep using
LOCAL_QUORUM? In which case, if I'm following your logic, even one of
the 3 goes down I'll still have 2 to ensure LOCAL_QUORUM succeeds?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Nate McCall n...@datastax.com wrote:
In your options, you
Yes - you would need at least 3 replicas per data center to use
LOCAL_QUORUM and survive a node failure.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Oleg Tsvinev oleg.tsvi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean I need to configure 3 replicas in each DC and keep using
LOCAL_QUORUM? In which case, if I'm following
I think that Oleg may have misunderstood how replicas are selected. If you have
3 nodes in your cluster and a RF of 2, Cassandra first selects what two nodes,
out of the 3 will get data, then, and only then does it write it out. The
selection is based on the row key, the token of the node, and
And now, when I have one node down with no chance of bringing it back
anytime soon, can I still change RF to 3 and get restore functionality
of my cluster? Should I run 'nodetool repair' or simple keyspace
update will suffice?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Nate McCall n...@datastax.com wrote:
Yes, I think I get it now. quorum of replicas != quorum of nodes
and I don't think quorum of nodes is ever defined. Thank you,
Konstantin.
Now, I believe I need to change my cluster to store data in two
remaining nodes in DC1, keeping 3 nodes in DC2. I believe nodetool
removetoken is what I need
Hi,
I try to upload sstable data on cassandra 0.8.4 cluster with json2sstable tool.
Each time I have to restart the node with new file imported and do repair for
the column family, otherwise new data will not show.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Zhong Li
This is what I'm trying to do:
Sample of the data:
RowKey: localhost
= (column=e3f3c900-d5b0-11e0-aa6b-005056c8:ACTIVE, value=?xml
version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes?,
timestamp=1315001665761000)
= (column=e4515250-d5b0-11e0-aa6b-005056c8:INACTIVE, value=?xml
version=1.0
Hi,
Is there any recommendation about commodity server hardware specs
if 100TB database size is expected and its heavily write application.
Should
I got with high powered CPU (12 cores) and 48TB HDD and 640GB RAM and
total of 3 servers of this spec. Or many smaller commodity servers are
Okay, I reversed the composite and seem to have come up with a solution.
Although the rows are sorted by the status, the statuses are sorted
temporally which helps. I tell you this type of modeling really breaks the
rules :)
Anthony
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Ikeda
many smaller servers way better
45 matches
Mail list logo
