Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3819. Thanks!
Huy
The schema change was that we created a new key space with composite type
CFs, but later we had to change some definition/CF names, so we dropped
the
key space and recreated with new definition.
sounds like a bug,
This is on single node environment, and there is a lot of data in commit logs
needs to be flushed to sstables. So remove commit logs will cause data lost.
Fortunately, this issue happens on a new key space that have CFs that use
composite type, and we can sacrifice loosing data on this new key
Looks like this is related to bug in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3558.
Show schema shows sstable compression chunk_length_kb on the node that the
schame was applied is 65536, thought the schema update statement specified
chunk_length_kb=64, and on other nodes on the
We got the server to start up by applying the patch from the mentioned JIRA,
and modified the configuration parameters reader code to set
chunk_lenghth_size to null on start so that cassandra will use the default
value of 64k. We then deployed the code to the rest of the servers in the
cluster,
Hi,
We are running 1.0.3. I tried to restart a node, but it won't come up.
Below is the error logged:
INFO [SSTableBatchOpen:1] 2011-12-13 04:14:52,095 SSTableReader.java (line
134) Opening /u01/cassandra/data/system/HintsColumnFamily-hb-114 (66 bytes)
INFO [main] 2011-12-13 04:14:52,145
to apply the patch and compile new binary. We currently running
1.0.3.
Thanks!
Huy
unsafeAssassinateEndpoint
Brandon Williams wrote
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, huyle lt;huyle@gt; wrote:
The clocks are very sync'ed between the nodes as they have ntp running
hitting our time servers
Hi,
We have 2 nodes have been decommissioned from the cluster running 1.0.3.
However, the live nodes still making references to the decommissioned nodes
3 days after the nodes were decommissioned. Nodetool does not show the
decommissioned noes. Here are sample log entries:
INFO
The clocks are very sync'ed between the nodes as they have ntp running
hitting our time servers.
Huy
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/decommissioned-nodes-still-being-gossipped-tp7051526p7051701.html
Sent from the
I am not sure of no disk option, but as for fast unit testing, you can try
RAM disk for storage.
Huy
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/is-there-a-no-disk-storage-mode-tp7051192p7051728.html
Sent from the
Yes, we do have RF=3.
That explains it all. Thanks Peter!
Huy
Peter Schuller wrote
What may be causing high IO wait on 2.new and 3.new?
Do you have RF=3?
The problem with 'nodetool ring' in terms of interpreting those '0%'
is that it does not take RF and replication strategy into
Hi,
Whenever I start up cassandra 1.0.3, I notice the following warning:
WARN [main] 2011-11-24 07:57:13,129 CFMetaData.java (line 402) Unable to
instantiate cache provider
org.apache.cassandra.cache.SerializingCacheProvider; using default
We don't use subcomparator . We doubled checked comparator, and it look fine.
There was typo in my original post. I mean to say upgrade to 1.0.2 from
0.6.13. This issue is now resolved after we upgrade cass to 1.0.3.
Thanks!
Huy
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
We got Added column does not sort as the last column error in the logs
after upgrading to cass 1.0.3 from 0.6.13. After running scrub, we still
getting the error.
Here is stack trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Added column does not sort as the last column
at
13 matches
Mail list logo