I have done this several times i.e disabling compression at the table
level. Never had any issues.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 01:37, Elliott Sims wrote:
> The main downside I see is that you're hitting a less-tested codepath. I
> think very few installations have compression disabled today.
>
> On
I'm running Cassandra 3.11 on ZFS on Linux. I use the ZFS compression
and have disabled the Cassandra SSTable compression.
I can't comment on the possible pros you've mentioned, because I didn't
do enough tests on them. I know the compression ratio is marginally
better with the same
The main downside I see is that you're hitting a less-tested codepath. I
think very few installations have compression disabled today.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 7:06 AM Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using a fairly standard install of Cassandra 3.11 on FreeBSD
> 12, by default filesystem
Hi,
I'm using a fairly standard install of Cassandra 3.11 on FreeBSD
12, by default filesystem is compressed using LZ4 and Cassandra tables
are compressed using LZ4 as well.
I was wondering if anybody had data about this already (or else, I will
probably do some tests myself,
