The O'Reilly book on Cass says this about READ consistency level ALL:
Query all nodes. Wait for all nodes to respond, and return to the
client the record with the most recent timestamp. Then, if necessary,
perfrom a read repair in the background. If any nodes fail or respond,
fail the read
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:09 PM, AJ a...@dude.podzone.net wrote:
It says all nodes. Shouldn't it say replication_factor nodes?
My preferred phrasing would be all replicas.
I can understand this if the given row already exists from a previous write
and one of the nodes that contains a replica
