Re: Disable Swap? batch_mutate failed: out of sequence response

2011-04-06 Thread Héctor Izquierdo Seliva
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 09:18 +0200, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva escribió: > I took a look at vmstats, and there was no swap. Also, our monitoring > tools showed no swap being used at all. It's running with mlockall and > all that. 8GB heap on a 16GB machine > I tried disabling swap completely, and

Re: Disable Swap? batch_mutate failed: out of sequence response

2011-04-06 Thread Héctor Izquierdo Seliva
I took a look at vmstats, and there was no swap. Also, our monitoring tools showed no swap being used at all. It's running with mlockall and all that. 8GB heap on a 16GB machine El mar, 05-04-2011 a las 21:24 +0200, Peter Schuller escribió: > > Would you recommend to disable system swap as a rule?

Re: Disable Swap? batch_mutate failed: out of sequence response

2011-04-05 Thread Peter Schuller
> Would you recommend to disable system swap as a rule?   I'm running on Debian > 64bit and am seeing light swapping: I'm not Jonathan, but *yes*. I would go so far as to say that disabling swap is a good rule of thumb for *most* production systems that serve latency sensitive traffic. For a mach

Disable Swap? batch_mutate failed: out of sequence response

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan Colby
Hi Jonathan - Would you recommend to disable system swap as a rule? I'm running on Debian 64bit and am seeing light swapping: total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 8003 7969 33 0 0 4254 -/+ buffers/cache: