On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
Is this query the equivalent of a full table scan? Without a starting
point get_range_slice is just starting at token 0?
It is, but that's what you asked for after all. If you want to start at a
given token you can
I see. It is fairly misleading because it is a query that does not
work at scale. This syntax is only helpful if you have less then a few
thousand rows in Cassandra.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Edward Capriolo
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
I see. It is fairly misleading because it is a query that does not
work at scale. This syntax is only helpful if you have less then a few
thousand rows in Cassandra.
Just for the sake of argument, how is that
A remark like maybe we just shouldn't allow that and leave that to the
map-reduce side would make sense, but I don't see how this is misleading.
Yes. Bingo.
It is misleading because it is not useful in any other context besides
someone playing around with a ten row table in cqlsh. CQL stops me
Ok, I slightly misunderstood your initial complain, my bad. I largely agree
with you, though I'm more conflicted on what the right resolution is. But
I'll follow up on the ticket to avoid repetition.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
I created
If we create a column family:
CREATE TABLE videos (
videoid uuid,
videoname varchar,
username varchar,
description varchar,
tags varchar,
upload_date timestamp,
PRIMARY KEY (videoid,videoname)
);
The CLI views this column like so:
create column family videos
with column_type =
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
CQL3 Allows me to search the second component of a primary key. Which
really just seems to be component 1 of a composite column.
So what thrift operation does this correspond to? This looks like a
column slice
