If I have a database that partitions naturally into non-overlapping
datasets, in which there are no references between datasets, where each
dataset is quite large (i.e. large enough to merit its own cluster from the
point of view of quantity of data), should I set up one cluster per database
or
I would add that running one cluster is operationally less work than
running multiple.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:15 AM, David Boxenhorn da...@taotown.com wrote:
If I have a database that partitions naturally into non-overlapping
datasets, in which there are no references between datasets, where