ion, thus
> applying ttl() on them makes sense. I'm not sure however if the CQL parser
> allows this syntax
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:13 PM Carl Mueller
> wrote:
>
>> I could be wrong, but UDTs I think are written (and overwritten) as one
>> unit, so the notion of a TT
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:13 PM Carl Mueller
wrote:
> I could be wrong, but UDTs I think are written (and overwritten) as one
> unit, so the notion of a TTL on a UDT field doesn't exist, the TTL is
> applied to the overall structure.
>
> Think of it like a serialized json objec
I could be wrong, but UDTs I think are written (and overwritten) as one
unit, so the notion of a TTL on a UDT field doesn't exist, the TTL is
applied to the overall structure.
Think of it like a serialized json object with multiple fields. To update a
field they deserialize the json
When I run the command 'select ttl(udt_field) from table; I'm getting an error
'InvalidRequest: Error from server: code=2200 [Invalid query] message="Cannot
use selection function ttl on collections"'. How can I get the TTL from a UDT
field?
Mark Furlong
[cid:image001.png@01D5A92
