Hi
A little while ago I tried cassandra's read n write operations and timed it.
I am using Pandra for communication with cassandra. System is CentOS 5 with
2 GB RAM and dual core.
I inserted 10 rows in around 30 secs and read the same in 25 seconds.
If anyone of you have run similar tests
I dont think it would be a good idea not to use pandra for benchmarks as we
are going to use pandra for our application. Secondly, it will give Pandra
guys some boost to enhance the performance of thier library.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Actually, to be honest I dont know how to insert 100 rows without PHP or
Pandra. If you could help me out I will surely try it and will share the
results with you guys.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Paul Prescod pres...@gmail.com wrote:
How will they know whether the performance problem
First, read carefully and understand :
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ThriftExamples#PHP
But you really shouldn't bother with benchmarks. Ask yourself this question
: what if my Cassandra performs at 5k operation/s ? And what about 3k
op/s?. In other terms why are you benchmarking ?. You've got
contrib/py_stress
Although that's still written in a scripting language, it at least
uses threading.
Anyhow, what's your real goal? Inserting 100K or 1M rows in 30 seconds
from a single-threaded environment like PHP is pretty good. Do your
business goals require more?
Also: Is it 100K or 1M? In
