Re: tablehistogram shows high sstables

2021-05-07 Thread MyWorld
High latency at table level could be a result of no of factors. High tombstones GC Bloom filter fp I/O bottleneck Insufficient cache or threads Since your partion size is not a problem here, try running major compaction on this table. Also you can turn on caching for this table. As mentioned

Re: tablehistogram shows high sstables

2021-04-30 Thread vytenis silgalis
17ms read latency for the 50th percentile is actually a pretty high latency in my experience, I prefer to see the 75th percentile read latency to be around 1-2ms. Of course it depends on your use case and what your performance objectives are. On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:05 AM Kane Wilson wrote:

Re: tablehistogram shows high sstables

2021-04-29 Thread Kane Wilson
It does imply the SSTables are being read - how big is your data size and how much memory on the nodes? It's certainly possible to get low latencies despite many SSTables, but I'd expect small read sizes paired with a lot of memory. raft.so - Cassandra consulting, support, managed services On

tablehistogram shows high sstables

2021-04-28 Thread Ayub M
The table has 24 sstables with size tiered compaction, when I run nodetool tablehistograms I see 99% percentile of the queries are showing up 24 as the number of sstables. But the read latency is very low, my understanding from the tableshistograms's sstable column is - it shows how many sstables