You should force at least 17 š
On Sep 27, 2024 at 2:23:02āÆPM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> A belated, but nonetheless exciting announcement. Our team recently
> released the first milestone of Cayenne 5.0.
>
> There are more than a hundred Jiras in the release notes, so it is easy to
> get lost š B
erything is customizable of course :)
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>
> > On Apr 27, 2023, at 12:09 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I of course have an unusual situation that I'm not sure how to handle.
> :)
> >
> > I was goi
Hey all,
I of course have an unusual situation that I'm not sure how to handle. :)
I was going to write a lot of background, but I don't know if it would help
or just confuse the situation. š¤£
The situation I have is in one specific situation, I'd like Cayenne to
always add an attribute to the U
n your case.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 13, 2022, at 10:08 PM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> > >
> > > My guess is the new logic in
> > > DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.mergeSameObjectIds with OpIdFactory has a
> > > flaw.
My guess is the new logic in
DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.mergeSameObjectIds with OpIdFactory has a
flaw. It's a little above my paygrade to figure out why. š¤£
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 1:44 PM Lon Varscsak wrote:
> I have a pretty serious regression between these versions. I'm no
I have a pretty serious regression between these versions. I'm not 100%
sure what's going on yet, but figured I'd drop a note and see if anyone has
any thoughts. I have a situation where I remove all the objects in a
relationship, and then reinsert them (same PK). This has been working in
4.2 fo
I have natural keys just about everywhere and have only encountered one
issue. Exposing the key to the DataObject is fine, but don't expose the
same key in a detail object. So if you have OrderHeader.orderNumber that
can be exposed, but if that object has a to-many to OrderLines and also has
orde
mapped that as To-Many AND To-Dependent PK, which doesn't make
> sense.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 6:14 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > I forgot to mention that I'm running 4.2.M4-SNAPSHOT (updated from github
> > as of an hour ago).
> >
> > O
e
> in
> > > > your PK/FK mapping on the DbEntities.
> > > >
> > > > For example, in order_header, you have order_header ->>
> > > order_detail_sales,
> > > > but you've mapped that as To-Many AND To-Dependent PK, which doesn't
I forgot to mention that I'm running 4.2.M4-SNAPSHOT (updated from github
as of an hour ago).
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:06 PM Lon Varscsak wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a setup where I have an optional to-one relationship, but when I
> try to clear the relationship and commitCha
Hey all,
I have a setup where I have an optional to-one relationship, but when I try
to clear the relationship and commitChanges, I get a low-level Cayenne
error along with some in appropriate sql generated.
where it's doing an UPDATE to order_detail_costs should be a no-op, because
the object wa
I have a DB that doesn't have deferred constraints, so I had ObjectStyle
build org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.operation.GraphBasedDbRowOpSorter.
It's less efficient, but honestly I don't really notice a performance hit.
It's also not perfect (it triggers fetches sometimes of related data), but
in
You could commit your batch of 10 and then on error, check each object
against the DB. If the batch succeeds, there is nothing special to do.
Assuming your "failure" batches are infrequent, then the time to check them
won't be an issue.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:54 AM Tony Giaccone wrote:
> Yea
aunch.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Apr 19, 2021, at 2:31 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > For some reason the recent version of CayenneModeler (4.2.M4-SNAPSHOT)
> > crashes on launch. The only thing I did was upgrade packages in
> HomeB
Hey all,
For some reason the recent version of CayenneModeler (4.2.M4-SNAPSHOT)
crashes on launch. The only thing I did was upgrade packages in HomeBrew.
I'm running on an M1 MacBook Air. I recompiled it and no luck. If I run
from the command line, it works fine though. š¤
Here's the console f
wanting to deal with java.sql.Timestamp.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Feb 3, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to change the default date types that get returned by
> > SQLTemplate queries to use java.time classes instead of Date?
> >
&g
Is there any way to change the default date types that get returned by
SQLTemplate queries to use java.time classes instead of Date?
I know I can specify it for specific queries (#result), but I want to
change them for the whole application.
Thanks,
Lon
Assuming these are in the same JVM, I think what you're looking for is peer
context synchronization. This is disabled by default (but might have been
on by default previously). Wherever you create your ServerRuntime you can
add this:
binder.bindMap(Boolean.class,
Constants.PROPERTIES_MAP).put(Co
, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:12 AM Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
> "invalidateObjects" should invalidate relationships too. IIRC this worked
> exactly as you'd expect in a root context. I don't use nested contexts.
> Wonder if a bug crept in there?
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
I have a situation where I need to invalidate an object and have it go
back to it's committed state (whether that's from the db or a parent
context). If I invalidate the object, it's attributes seem to do what I'm
expecting, but it appears that it leaves relationships alone. I need a way
to inval
I am running 4.2.M2-SNAPSHOT š¤« in production :P
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:06 PM John Huss wrote:
> For what it is worth, I often run pre-release versions in production. I am
> not running 4.2.M1 yet, but have tested it a lot and have not had any
> problems.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:28 PM An
It's simply %string%. I can try that.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:21 AM Michael Gentry wrote:
> Hi Lon,
>
> What does your pattern look like? Did you try adding a "?s" to your
> expression?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:05 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
Hey all, trying to use likeIgnoreCase on an in-memory list and it appears
not to work if there is a new line in the text. The Pattern would need
Pattern.DOTALL as a flat to work properly. Would you consider this a bug?
-Lon
t; class does not imply Persistent object anywhere, so I guess Property should
> not either.
>
> @Nikita, what do you think?
>
> Andrus
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I use Property-type clas
Hey all,
I use Property-type classes for all sorts of things, usually for Cayenne
related activities...but sometimes they're really useful on POJOs too. The
new Property related classes (like EntityProperty) require the class to be
a subclass of Persistent. I can't see where this is actually
rel
e494d6b7fafbeadd1a41b5d647d82438c7a0591ed87b4f3b4b3e20b@%3Cdev.cayenne.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58318730/what-is-the-current-best-method-of-getting-the-changes-to-an-object-hierarchy-in
>
>
>
> > On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> >
Is there any way to get the values of relationships from snapshots? I know
how to do it for attributes, but can't seem to figure out how to do it for
relationships.
Thanks,
Lon
ave the metadata for the blob, and
> possibly other data as required. That way you can fetch in the name, file
> size, type, etc without fetching in the blob until needed.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:02 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have
Hey all,
I have a blob column in an entity, but I don't want to always actually load
the blob, just on demand (but I still want to be able to see the other
attributes in the entity). Any best practice here to have the blob be lazy?
Thanks,
Lon
I concur with the idea that a Java-served web app (hosted inside an
Electron app) would be best.
@Emmerson - I don't know if there were JIRAs created, I didn't create them
personally.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:20 AM Michael Gentry wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:10 AM Andrus Adamchik
> wrote
s Adamchik
wrote:
> Screenshots are stripped by the list management software, but the
> description is pretty clear. I am not using 4.2 myself, but we do need to
> fix it before we release 4.2.M1.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Sep 26, 2019, at 1:08 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> &
Hey all,
It looks like when adding a db-relationship in the Modeler (4.2.M1-SNAPSHOT
from today) the potential target entities is not sorted (which is only
mildly annoying), but doesn't contain any target entities outside of the
current data map (blocker). Am i missing something?
Thanks!
-Lon
nding on the model delete rules.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:14 PM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I want to confirm that there are no situations where removing an object
> > from a relationship will automatically cause
Hey all,
I want to confirm that there are no situations where removing an object
from a relationship will automatically cause that object to be deleted in
the OC. It's fully manual, right?
-Lon
does that
> trimming on "master", just like it did before:
>
> // the first "true" is "trimChars"
> map.registerType(new CharType(true, false));
>
> So this part should work.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Jul 24, 2019, at 2:18 PM, Lon Va
at...@objectstyle.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So, if the previous behavior was normal, I'll move it back.
> > >> This is task for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2602
> > >> And this is commit for it:
> > >>
HAR_PK_TEST t0 WHERE
> RTRIM(t0.PK_COL) = ? [bind: 1->PK_COL:123]
> For 4.2 SELECT RTRIM(t0.OTHER_COL), RTRIM(t0.PK_COL) FROM CHAR_PK_TEST t0
> WHERE RTRIM(t0.PK_COL) = ? [bind: 1->PK_COL:123]
> Maybe you can add some more details for it?
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 7:47 PM Lo
0].[part_number])* = ?
[bind: 1->part_number:'120476']
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:47 AM Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:04 AM Nikita Timofeev
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fixed this, see [1]. Thank you for another catch!
>>
>&g
gt; Does this help?
>
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/910374/why-does-java-have-transient-fields
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:20 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > Any reason we can't have Property be Serializable? I have situations
> where
> >
Any reason we can't have Property be Serializable? I have situations where
I will keep references to properties in a web page (like for dynamic
columns) and my framework serializes those things (or errors out if it's
not serializable). I originally solved this with having my own Subclass be
Seria
Thanks!
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:04 AM Nikita Timofeev
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fixed this, see [1]. Thank you for another catch!
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2578
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:28 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> >
On May 7, 2019, at 1:34 AM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyway to specify that an Object Entity uses a stored_procedure
> to
> > fetch its data?
> >
> > -Lon
>
>
Is there anyway to specify that an Object Entity uses a stored_procedure to
fetch its data?
-Lon
Hey all,
I have a join from order_detail_sales to continuity_detail based on
order_number and order_line_number. When fetching the to-one
getContinuityDetail I'm getting an error because the query generated is
swapping the keys:
SELECT [t0].[intent_date], [t0].[line_end_date], [t0].[line_setup_d
id RTRIM on the join conditions on
> >> SQLServer, we probably shouldn't.
> >>
> >> Fixed-size space-padded columns (aka CHAR columns) are fundamentally
> >> stupid and unfriendly. How are they even supposed to work? Can we join
> them
> >> with VA
You're the best!
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 6:46 AM Nikita Timofeev
wrote:
> Hi Lon,
>
> I've fixed this [1]. Select translator incorrectly translated
> Expressions in some cases.
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2575
>
&g
t; Andrus
>
> > On May 2, 2019, at 5:54 PM, Nikita Timofeev
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is again about new translator. Seems like I was too optimistic
> > unifying SQLServer and Sybase adapters.
> > This RTRIM() behavior is from SQLServer and I
Hey again :)
I have a situation where the query created is missing an "AND" resulting in
invalid sql. Here is the sql that's generated:
SELECT DISTINCT t0.allow_backorder, t0.allow_multiples, t0.business_unit,
t0.buy_amount, t0.customer_choice, t0.end_date, t0.get_amount, t0.hidden,
t0.internal_
Hey all,
I'm working to integrate 4.2 into my code base and I've run into a snag.
It appears that some queries are slower and what I'm finding is that when I
have CHAR columns, that it ends up doing a join that is RTRIM(column) =
RTRIM(other column). This results in the query optimizer not using
It also appears that if you use parent/child contexts, even if you
serialize both contexts, the child context doesn't remember that it's
parent channel was another context.
-Lon
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:16 PM Lon Varscsak wrote:
> There's unfortunately no clean solution
FYI, who ever wrote the DB Import stuff...you deserve an award. Love it.
That is all, :)
Lon
ns why you saw those values
> in your other case.
> I've pushed fix for this to 4.1 branch and tested it with your test
> application. Everything looks good now.
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:17 AM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Also wondering, would this be a m
t; Andrus
>
> > On Feb 26, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > I always forget this part, I'm working off of 4.1.M3-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:54 AM Lon Varscsak
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
&
>
> There's unfortunately no clean solution for an "unmanaged"
> (de)serialization of the context-attached auto-expanding object graph. The
> one we have right now, that requires the context to be the serialization
> "root", seems like the best choice out of the available options.
Can you expand
I always forget this part, I'm working off of 4.1.M3-SNAPSHOT
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:54 AM Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> A few weeks ago I posted an email about a bug when serializing, and I
> never really looked much more in to it. However, I've now encountered
t; https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/STABLE-4.0/cayenne-server/src/test/java/org/apache/cayenne/DataObjectSerializationIT.java#L129
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:07 AM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Recently I switched to 4.1's field based
Hey all,
A few weeks ago I posted an email about a bug when serializing, and I never
really looked much more in to it. However, I've now encountered a
different issue if I'm using Map based data objects. If I have a data
object, access a relationship, then serialize the object (and it's
DataCont
Hey all,
Recently I switched to 4.1's field based data objects (I've been using
4/4.1 for a while, but using the Map based objects) and I ran into an
issue. It appears that when using this type of object, the
de-serialization results in an object that is not usable. It results in a
HOLLOW object
t; I haven't tried this myself, but what happens if you eagerly prefetch this
> relationship? I suspect Cayenne would just set this property to null and
> there will be no FFE.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Dec 13, 2018, at 12:35 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > I
ow
to do that without forcing OriginCode to fetch for every Order fetched 100%
of the time.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Lon Varscsak wrote:
> When the code goes to try to access the Order->OriginCode.getProperty() it
> goes to fire the fault and will trigger that exception.
>
>
uess during the insertion by using a not existent FK, right?
>
> if it is not the case, please provide details in order to understand the
> full context!
>
> Thanks
>
> EmeCas
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:51 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > Okay, so I have a situ
Okay, so I have a situation where I have a FK to a table where the DBA was
allowing objects to be deleted. Think Order to OriginCode (basically a way
to know which catalog the order came from)...but the OriginCode record has
been deleted. I'm going to put a stop to that, but in the meantime I nee
lol, my whole DB is meaningful primary keys...yay us! So far, Cayenne's
default logic has handled it without exception, but I've got all of the
relationships mapped out. I'm assuming your situation is different, but I
had to jump in and give a hooray for meaningful PKs. :P
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at
an ObjectContext
>
> > or should I just parse through newObjects()?
>
> Yes.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Aug 16, 2018, at 2:25 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> >
> > I have a situation where I need to query the inserted objects in an
> > ObjectContext to see if
I have a situation where I need to query the inserted objects in an
ObjectContext to see if there's one already created. I know this is an odd
situation, but is there a way to accomplish this or should I just parse
through newObjects()?
Thanks,
Lon
ot;);
>
> public void willUpdate() {
> }
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:47 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've got a data object who has a preUpdate callback so that I can set
> > required values (like a timestamp) before update. Acco
Hey all,
I've got a data object who has a preUpdate callback so that I can set
required values (like a timestamp) before update. According to the docs
this should work in the parent-child setup, but that doesn't seem to be the
case. Thoughts? Here's a snippet of the stacktrace:
Validation fail
Hey all,
I have an entity with a blob in it, but it has has to-many joins. When I
go to do a join across these, I will no longer get a distinct set of data
(because at least in Sybase, you can't 'distinct' a blob column).
Any ideas on how to implement this so that the blob is lazy and/or in a
di
Wow! I just finally saw the new db import work. That is awesome, so much
easier to use. Thanks to whomever did it all!
-Lon
That would explain it. :) Thanks John.
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 6:27 AM, John Huss wrote:
> Yes
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 7:12 AM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > I have a situation where I fetched a large amount of objects (50k) and
> > prefetched a bunch of relat
I have a situation where I fetched a large amount of objects (50k) and
prefetched a bunch of relationshipsā¦this all worked as expected (although I
didnāt realize that this set of data was that large at the time)ā¦but what
caught my eye is that even though it pre-fetched the relationships it was
firi
I have a foreign key id that is 0 (zero). Our old system would interpret
this the same as it would for null.
I'm trying to see where I could hook into the system so the Cayenne can
convert these to null on the fly. Any ideas?
-Lon
I think the part that's missing is a "distinct". I'm assuming there are 4
stockcurrent_corporativo rows for that one product, but if it had a
distinct it would be showing one. I don't think that
ObjectSelect/FluentSelect have the ability to turn on/off distinct, but for
me, this always generates
o a timeout.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:40 AM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > In the case of using a more specific cache (like discussed in the other
> > thread), the problem is these āsmallā caches get abandoned. The
> > documentation says ālocalCacheā is bound
ername or something to it) and that
> will
> >> work, but you'll need to have these cache names configured in your cache
> >> provider already or have a default that makes sense. That might be
> >> difficult to do.
> >>
> >> I'm interested
verall cache
> performance. Since most caches have an LRU policy, those abandoned entries
> will eventually be pushed out of the cache, replaced by more recent entries
> from other contexts.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Nov 9, 2017, at 2:08 AM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> >
> >
Hey all,
I would have bet large sums of money that a custom implementation of
QueryCache would result in a new QueryCache object per context (local).
However, it looks like a NestedQueryContext gets created and only one
instance of the specified QueryCache is created (in DataContextFactory).
I'd
t;false" );
> }
> };
>
> Maik
>
>
> > Am 08.11.2017 um 01:40 schrieb Lon Varscsak :
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Iāve been using cache groups to do refreshing of object lists and it
> > occurred to me today that this refresh is across a
Hey guys, I have a situation that I think is caused by having the same set
of objects (different object contexts) open in the same application. When
my web application goes to serialize an object context (I think) I get this
error:
Any ideas on where to look at what I might be doing wrong? Than
Hey all,
Iāve been using cache groups to do refreshing of object lists and it
occurred to me today that this refresh is across all object contexts in my
application. So if User A has a list of orders for their account and that
is cached with the group āorderHistoryā and User B also has a list of
> (don't remember the API offhand).
>
> 1) Start transaction
> 2) Perform your deletes (or whatever you need to happen first)
> 3) Commit the ObjectContext
> 4) Perform your other work
> 5) Commit the ObjectContext
> 6) Finish the transaction
>
>
> On Tue
Unfortunately, noā¦legacy structures.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 2/8/17 9:12AM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> > In this case, because itās an object with the same PK as a previously
> > deleted object, technically Iād need deletes to happen for this
, 2017 at 3:54 PM, John Huss wrote:
> You're looking for the ashwood entity sorter
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:40 PM Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
>
> > I think in EOF I handled this with a custom ordering of operations,
> where I
> > had a master list of entities in the orde
, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> Hey guys, so Cayenne does db operations in insert/update/delete
> orderā¦which makes sense in most cases. But in Sybase I donāt have deferred
> constraints (itās not an option) and if I delete an object and then
> recreate it will the same
Hey guys, so Cayenne does db operations in insert/update/delete orderā¦which
makes sense in most cases. But in Sybase I donāt have deferred constraints
(itās not an option) and if I delete an object and then recreate it will
the same primary key I end up with a database error because it tries to
in
138
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> > Hey guys, I have a table (or three) that uses identity columns (Sybase
> > generated valuesā¦not like a sequence). Looking at the 3.0 docs it
> suggests
> > that it supports this for SQLServer (which wa
Hey guys, I have a table (or three) that uses identity columns (Sybase
generated valuesā¦not like a sequence). Looking at the 3.0 docs it suggests
that it supports this for SQLServer (which was originally based on
Sybase)ā¦but I canāt seem to find it in the code. Any idea where this is?
Does it sti
I support it.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Nikita Timofeev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is discussion on dev@list [1], and I want to mention it here too.
> The question is simple is it time to drop support for Java 7 out of
> Cayenne starting from 4.1 version that is in early development now.
y and ObjectId internal
> state, but still need to research this deeper.
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> > Okay, Iāve gotten farther, but still have an issue. Iāve removed the FK
> > IDs from my objects and if I donāt pre-assign PKs to them itā
partial state
seems to confuse it too. I assume if I assign the order_number, then Iāll
get the previous error where it tries to fault from the DB. How difficult
would it be to modify Cayenne to deal with these TEMP objects better?
-Lon
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Lon Varscsak
wrote
ctId correctly)
>
> And there can be even more cases when meaningful Fk (as well as Pk)
> can fail, so it is pretty general recommendation to stay away from
> those as much as you can.
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> > Okay hereās a ma
-SNAPSHOT. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Lon
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> I can also get it to throw this error:
>
> Caused by: org.apache.cayenne.FaultFailureException: [v.4.1.M1-SNAPSHOT
> Jul 19 2017 19:49:41] Error resolving fault, no
in question is new on an OrderHeader which
isnāt new.
-Lon
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> Okay, Iāll see if I can work up a test case. Note: This only happens if
> the objects in question are new objects (not in the db). When it tries to
> find th
test case?
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Lon Varscsak
> wrote:
> > Okay, that didnāt work.
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/68hsculni16ucg3/Screen%20Shot%
> 202017-07-13%20at%2010.50.24%20AM.png?dl=0
> >
> > -Lon
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017
Okay, that didnāt work.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/68hsculni16ucg3/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-13%20at%2010.50.24%20AM.png?dl=0
-Lon
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> Try this:
>
> http://gofile.me/34oeM/YdPU7U4j1
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Andrus Ad
Try this:
http://gofile.me/34oeM/YdPU7U4j1
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
> Unfortunately the mailing list strips attachments. Could you post the
> image elsewhere, like GoogleDrive or Dropbox?
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Jul 13, 2017, at 8:51 PM,
Is your key ācustomerNameForSortingā?
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Musall, Maik wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > Am 17.07.2017 um 16:08 schrieb John Huss :
> >
> > Expressions will work with non-modeled properties as long as the methods
> > look like getters - have the "get" prefix and no arguments.
I found the line thatās nulling it outā¦I just donāt understand at this deep
level whatās going on. Hereās the strack trace:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Lon Varscsak
wrote:
> I have an object (thatās new) in ObjectContextA that has a relationship to
> another new object (same OC)
I have an object (thatās new) in ObjectContextA that has a relationship to
another new object (same OC) which also has a reverse relationship. I then
create a child of that OC (ObjectContactB) and grab a local version of the
first object. At that time, the relationship object (and itās reverse) i
+1 Woot!
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
> > You mean Expression class has "andExp", not Property?
>
> Whoopsāof course I did. Pardon me.
>
>
> > The answer is "legacy". This API predates Property, ObjectSelect, and
> other 4.0 additions. It was done long time ago before
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
