Hello.
> Why
> was org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.solvers.LaguerreSolver.ComplexSolver
> made private in math 3.0? We used LaguerreSolver.solveAll() in version 2.1,
> it was deprecated in 2.2 without notice in the API that it would be
> removed, and now it's gone.
When something is deprecated,
Why
was org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.solvers.LaguerreSolver.ComplexSolver
made private in math 3.0? We used LaguerreSolver.solveAll() in version 2.1,
it was deprecated in 2.2 without notice in the API that it would be
removed, and now it's gone.
The code is still all there, but just hidden fr
ouch, apologize, that's why I didn't find my message in the proper list! :)
Thanks!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2012 10:08,
On 9 March 2012 10:08, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I asked INFRA to enable SvnPubSub (see INFRA-4513) they asked to wait
> on updating the site until they will have few infra issues solved.
Wrong list; INFRA-4513 is about Cocoon.
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
Hi all,
I asked INFRA to enable SvnPubSub (see INFRA-4513) they asked to wait
on updating the site until they will have few infra issues solved.
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
--
We can safely conclude from this that there is many reasons why 1.0
needs to be released, and 0.97 needs to die :).
I can agree to that.
Now that you have helped me so immensely, I will try to repay you a
little with some feedback on the project.
I will be biased by the 0.97 version and the