[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons CSV 1.4

2016-05-31 Thread Gary Gregory
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons CSV 1.4. The Apache Commons CSV library provides a simple interface for reading and writing CSV files of various types. The main changes are the addition of a few APIs to make low-GC use-cases possible. Details of all

Re: [pool] Any release plan for 2.4.3?

2016-05-31 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm ok with pushing out a new release. Any one else? Gary On May 31, 2016 3:33 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" wrote: > Hi, I'm Jungtaek Lim, collaborator of Jedis (Java Redis Client). > > Jedis uses Commons Pool 2.x but stucks on POOL-303 >

[pool] Any release plan for 2.4.3?

2016-05-31 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Hi, I'm Jungtaek Lim, collaborator of Jedis (Java Redis Client). Jedis uses Commons Pool 2.x but stucks on POOL-303 . It seems to be going to be released to 2.4.3, but 2.4.2 is released at Aug. 2015 which is 10 months ago. So I'd like to hear about

IPTC Caption-Abstract

2016-05-31 Thread Joakim Knudsen
Anyone know how to create this tag, and write it to a JPEG, using Sanselan? IPTCType.IPTC_TYPE_CAPTION_ABSTRACT Joakim

Re: Creating EXIF tags (TiffOutputField) the right way

2016-05-31 Thread Joakim Knudsen
Btw, ENCODING_UTF16 is just a String = "UTF-16LE" (Little Endian) On 31 May 2016 at 19:20, Joakim Knudsen wrote: > Following a post on the User-Commons-Apache log (from 2012), I ended up > with the following code which seems to work. > It writes proper Unicode, which I

Re: Creating EXIF tags (TiffOutputField) the right way

2016-05-31 Thread Joakim Knudsen
Following a post on the User-Commons-Apache log (from 2012), I ended up with the following code which seems to work. It writes proper Unicode, which I can read back successfully using ExifTool. I also see the comment nicely in Windows Explorer, and under File > Properties. Note I changed the field

Re: Creating EXIF tags (TiffOutputField) the right way

2016-05-31 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Joachim, Joakim Knudsen schrieb am Sa., 28. Mai 2016 um 21:10 Uhr: > Hi Benedikt, and thanks for replying! > > So, if FieldType is unused, maybe the alternative, simpler constructor is > more appropriate/correct to use? > > // try using the approach given in the