Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

So how does the visible memory usage differ? Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net From: Alex O'Ree Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 9:00:24 PM To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

--Jvm pointed directly at JRE/bin/server/jvm.dll or /bin/client/jvm.dll (this part is populated based on tomcat's service.bat --JvmMx 300 --StartMode jvm --StopMode jvm I've also tried adding the standard jvm xmx setting in ++JvmOptions however it didn't appear to have any affect. When running

Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

Depends on a number of factors, but with Java I typically not start to worry because of a few 100mb (especially since there are quite a few different metrics, real virtual or resident). But since your question is about the service runner I would definitely compare it to java.exe launcher and

Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

So 500mb overhead is normal? On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 8:36 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 26/04/18 11:32, Alex O'Ree wrote: > > I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800 > > That looks normal. > > "Maximum Java Heap Size" != "Maximum OS Memory footprint" > > Mark > > > > > On

Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem

that would work for embedding comment tag into images which conform to JPEG and TIFF formats if your requirement includes embedding tag into GIF image format you will want to consider Adobe XMP https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14302/ch_metadata.htm 5 Working with Metadata in

Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

On 26/04/18 11:32, Alex O'Ree wrote: > I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800 That looks normal. "Maximum Java Heap Size" != "Maximum OS Memory footprint" Mark > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 9:59 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 16/04/18 14:37, Alex O'Ree wrote: >>> I've

Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?

I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800 On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 9:59 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/04/18 14:37, Alex O'Ree wrote: > > I've been experimenting with prunsrv and have been able to get my java > > process to fire up as a windows service when using the "jvm"

Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem

> I normally use exiftool to compare what imaging is producing. The htmldump is > quite useful. I just ran the normal info extraction and here you see the comment I would like to reproduce (Comment): ExifTool Version Number : 10.94 File Name : 109_Background.jpg

Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem

I normally use exiftool to compare what imaging is producing. The htmldump is quite useful. I thought you had to create the tag in Java, but if you can use other tools and it's easier for you, then that might be the best option. Otherwise you can create pretty much any other metadata tag you'd

Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem

Hi Bruno, > The EXIF tags in imaging should match what's in this page: > https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html > > Which contains the XPComment and UserComment tags you mentioned, but no > equivalent to the other comment one. this is quite inetersting. Actually I have

Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem

Hi Andrea, The EXIF tags in imaging should match what's in this page: https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html Which contains the XPComment and UserComment tags you mentioned, but no equivalent to the other comment one. If you really need to match that tag, then I think