Re: [dbcp] Abandon Connection - not Logging in standalone

2015-07-27 Thread Bernd
Hi Phil, ah great, I can confirm that it is logging something if I add the auto flush: https://gist.github.com/ecki/345ee08ac97820972fe7#file-result-autoflush4s-txt (It even logs the active statements, so I guess it tries to kill them (but get blocked by my initial problem). What do you think

Fwd: Re: [dbcp] Abandon Connection - not Logging in standalone

2015-07-26 Thread Phil Steitz
Forgot to copy list Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [dbcp] Abandon Connection - not Logging in standalone Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:38 -0700 From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com To: Bernd Eckenfels e...@zusammenkunft.net On 7/25/15 8:19 AM, Bernd

Re: [dbcp] Abandon Connection - not Logging in standalone

2015-07-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 7/23/15 4:18 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, I noticed that with Oracle drivers you cannot kill a busy connection by closing it (since close(), _getPC(), isOpen() and stmt.close() all will synchronize on the (busy) physical connection. I noticed this in a custom persistence layer, so I

[dbcp] Abandon Connection - not Logging in standalone

2015-07-23 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, I noticed that with Oracle drivers you cannot kill a busy connection by closing it (since close(), _getPC(), isOpen() and stmt.close() all will synchronize on the (busy) physical connection. I noticed this in a custom persistence layer, so I thought to check out if DBCP handles this