Hello, Thanks to everyone who contributes to this library.
I have not contributed to development [imaging] library yet.
I haven't seen the "development" ML yet, so I'll check the issue tickets to
see if there's one I can contribute to.
2022年12月9日(金) 2:37 Gary Gregory :
> Then I encourage
Then I encourage 1.0-beta1 ;-)
Gary
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 11:29 Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> No objection from me :) 1.0b or 1.0, doing any progress on [Imaging] would
> be grand.
>
> -Bruno
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > [Moving to "dev" ML...]
> >
> > Le jeu. 8
No objection from me :) 1.0b or 1.0, doing any progress on [Imaging] would
be grand.
-Bruno
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> [Moving to "dev" ML...]
>
> Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 16:56, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > Since we had alpha releases, should we have a beta?
>
>
[Moving to "dev" ML...]
Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 16:56, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Since we had alpha releases, should we have a beta?
+1
It would allow modifying the API in order to e.g. provide a code that
self-documents the caller's responsibility wrt validation of external
input. [Something
Since we had alpha releases, should we have a beta?
Gaty
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 09:29 Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 to using the dev mailing list as there are more people subscribed.
>
> Some more context that may help with contributing to 1.0. We had a vote for
> 1.0 some years ago, but
Hi,
+1 to using the dev mailing list as there are more people subscribed.
Some more context that may help with contributing to 1.0. We had a vote for
1.0 some years ago, but we had too many blocker issues. That release was
cancelled, and we started to slowly close the blocker issues for 1.0, and
Hello.
Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 05:44, cottonspace a écrit :
>
> Hi. Thank you for your reply.
>
> I think that the current alpha-3 version gives good and enough quality.
> But my business clients concerned about the stability of the library
> quality in alpha version.
This question question
Hi. Thank you for your reply.
I think that the current alpha-3 version gives good and enough quality.
But my business clients concerned about the stability of the library
quality in alpha version.
I'd like to contribute to the project also.
Regards.
2022年12月8日(木) 10:06 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hi.
Hi.
Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 01:10, cottonspace a écrit :
>
> Hello, I want to use this convenient library. However, the current version
> is alpha-3.
>
> If possible, I would like to wait for the release of the version 1.0 at
> starting to use it.
Why?
>
> At now, do you have any prospects for
Hello, I want to use this convenient library. However, the current version
is alpha-3.
If possible, I would like to wait for the release of the version 1.0 at
starting to use it.
At now, do you have any prospects for when the version 1.0 will be released?
Note) I would like to use this library
10 matches
Mail list logo
