Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-07 Thread Henri Yandell
+ Subject: RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Gnu Trove includes a set of benchmarks vs. the JCF. I don't understand why this is so controversial; a developer should be able to assess the suitability of a library for his or her purposes without it turning into a huge debate

RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Haswell, Joe
Consider using Gnu Trove (http://trove4j.sourceforge.net/). Joe H. | HP Software -Original Message- From: David Cogen [mailto:co...@ll.mit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 5:34 AM To: Commons Users List Subject: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? I am considering using Commons

Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread James Carman
Premature optimization with JDK5. I'd say stick to the JDK classes if you can and only try to beef up space/performance if you need to. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Haswell, Joe josiah.d.hasw...@hp.com wrote: Consider using Gnu Trove (http://trove4j.sourceforge.net/). Joe H. | HP Software

Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread James Carman
] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:30 PM To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Premature optimization with JDK5.  I'd say stick to the JDK classes if you can and only try to beef up space/performance if you need to. Normally I agree about evils of premature

Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
...@carmanconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:30 PM To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Premature optimization with JDK5. I'd say stick to the JDK classes if you can and only try to beef up space/performance if you need to. Normally I agree about evils

RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Martin Gainty
Brian how does primitive collections implementation perform better than JDK collections? thanks, Martin __ please do not alter or disrupt this transmission. thank you Subject: Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? From: br

Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
__ please do not alter or disrupt this transmission. thank you Subject: Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? From: br...@pontarelli.com Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:32:01 -0600 To: user@commons.apache.org I would assume once you get out

RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Haswell, Joe
numerous Ivy/Maven repositories. Joe H. | HP Software -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:41 AM To: user@commons.apache.org Subject: RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Brian how does primitive collections

Re: RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread James Carman
My point was that the Jdk classes can do this with type safety already and box/inbox it for you automatically. If that works for you, then I wouldn't suggest adding another dependency to the mix. If you absolutely need the space/speed improvement , then by all means use it. Adding dependencies

RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Martin Gainty
@commons.apache.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:42:29 + Subject: RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Gnu Trove includes a set of benchmarks vs. the JCF. I don't understand why this is so controversial; a developer should be able to assess the suitability of a library for his or her purposes without

Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this?

2010-11-02 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. From: josiah.d.hasw...@hp.com To: user@commons.apache.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:42:29 + Subject: RE: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? Gnu