if i upload only one file,i save the percent stats to session,i can get the
currect stats from ProgressListener.
if i upload two file f1,f2 in same session,but diffrent request.i cant
distinguish the two stats.
to solve this problem,
1.i add a text field named "key" to distinguish two
The 2D Euclidean union function sometimes produces an extra, in-line, vertex.
For example, in the "testUnion" function in the
org.apache.commons.math3.geometry.euclidean.twod.PolygonsSetTest, the
"set" produced by the union of "set1" and "set2" has 9 vertices. I
believe that there should only be 8
Hi all,
I'd like to see a code example using the current API, and then one
using the new proposed API. It's not clear to me if starting down this
road is creating a Spring Batch lite. Also, would you also transform
for the other types like iterable?
Gary
On Jul 29, 2013, at 0:36, Adam Foxman wr
Guilty ;-)
On Jul 29, 2013 6:26 AM, "James Carman" wrote:
> I did not intent to send it twice at all! :) I actually sent it from
> two different accounts. It didn't go through the first time, because
> the first account is not registered (someone must have moderated it
> through, though).
>
> O
Hello.
Sorry for the long problem description.
I implemented a radial basis function network for non-linear
regression with adaptive centers and adaptive basis shapes (diagonal
covariance matrix) using the Levenberg-Marquardt solver
(org.apache.commons.math3.optim.nonlinear.vector.jacobian.Le
I did not intent to send it twice at all! :) I actually sent it from
two different accounts. It didn't go through the first time, because
the first account is not registered (someone must have moderated it
through, though).
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay so you i
Okay so you intended to send it to the dev ML and the user ML once? Because
it appears that you've send it to the user ML twice instead ;-)
Benedikt
2013/7/29 James Carman
> Well, I wanted a broader audience, since it would impact users (if
> there are any).
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:10 AM
Well, I wanted a broader audience, since it would impact users (if
there are any).
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I guess this was supposed to go to the dev ML?
>
> Benedikt
>
>
> 2013/7/28 James Carman
>
>> All,
>>
>> I would doubt the remoting providers
Hi James,
I guess this was supposed to go to the dev ML?
Benedikt
2013/7/28 James Carman
> All,
>
> I would doubt the remoting providers are really used by anyone, but we
> should probably ask before removing them. We currently support the
> following remoting protocols:
>
> - Burlap
> - Hes
Hi Adam,
proposals for new functionality are better discussed on the dev ML.
Can you please repost your message there?
TIA!
Benedikt
2013/7/29 Adam Foxman
> Hi all,
>
> Have you considered building a stream-based version of CSVPrinter's
> printRecords(ResultSet ...)?
>
> ResultSet is unique i
10 matches
Mail list logo
