>Why? I'm not asking you, Tim, I just wonder why one would >they invent their
>own dialect of an existing format? The stream >indetifier is a 14 bytes and
>the checksum is a few bytes per >chunk that are actually helpful.
Couldn't agree more.
On 2016-05-04, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> And the internet has answers...according to
> http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/IWA
> "However, the variant of Snappy that is used does not comply with the
> spec for that format, omitting the stream identifier and checksum."
Why? I'm not asking
MPRESS-352
-Original Message-
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 8:46 AM
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Subject: [COMPRESS] .iwa files within latest iOS iWorks files?
All,
Over on Tika, we recently had a user post some
All,
Over on Tika, we recently had a user post some new Apple iWorks files. These
are zips that now contain mostly .iwa files. I found one mention on the
internet that these might be snappy compressed, but I'm not having luck opening
them. I get only -1 with SNAPPY_RAW, and I get an
