On 24 Sep 2009, at 02:31, go canal wrote:
no problem. the link is still very useful.
I found 'HTTP_Bulk_Document_API' but empty page now
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/%5BHTTP_Bulk_Document_API
Where di you find this (broken) link? The correct link is
2009/9/24 Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org:
On 24 Sep 2009, at 02:31, go canal wrote:
no problem. the link is still very useful.
I found 'HTTP_Bulk_Document_API' but empty page now
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/%5BHTTP_Bulk_Document_API
Where di you find this (broken) link? The correct link
On 24 Sep 2009, at 12:40, Matt Goodall wrote:
2009/9/24 Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org:
On 24 Sep 2009, at 02:31, go canal wrote:
no problem. the link is still very useful.
I found 'HTTP_Bulk_Document_API' but empty page now
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/%5BHTTP_Bulk_Document_API
Where
I'm running couchdb 0.9.1. Everything worked fine until I tried my first view:
test.js:
function(doc) {
emit(null, doc);
}
{error:error,reason:{function_clause,\n
[{couch_view_group,'-design_doc_to_view_group/1-fun-0-',\n
[{\test\,\function(doc) {\\n emit(null, doc);\\n}\},\n
Hi Oliver,You need to compose a view of a couple of sub elements. map and
reduce. So assuming that you were just attempting this as a temporary
query (rather than a stored one) you'd need to POST the following:
{
map: function(doc) {
emit(null, doc);
}}
The differences between the map, and the
Thought I'd throw this out here while I dig into the code...
Any ideas why this is happening?
I believe it is happening when the indices are being built for lucene.
For instance, if I change a fulltext function, it happens when I save
the document.
2009-09-24 10:47:37,744
The first thing I'd suspect is a Javascript syntax or runtime error in
your function (but, hey, I would say that, right?).
This stack trace is at the point where user-entered data hits the
runway, as it were, so it's not so unreasonable. Perhaps you could
paste your fulltext function?
B.
On
Yep, I stepped down into the source to see where it executes the function...
Here's the fulltext function.
I'm referencing these fields in _views functions without a problem.
fulltext: {
by_description: {
defaults:
{
store: yes
},
index: function(doc)
This is interesting, and I found it quite by accident. I just opened a
js shell to check the f...@value syntax thinking that the @value
wouldn't be a valid property name.
$ js
js f = {}
[object Object]
js f...@value = 2;
2
Which looks ok, but the first shell I actually tried did this:
$ js
Guys,
Does CouchDB provide any hooks for me to execute some custom logic
when a _show request points to non-existent docid?
Otherwise, I'm guessing it'd be best just to hack around this in my
nginx proxy...
Cheers,
Zach
Hi list,We have a little data modeling problem and I'm wondering there's a
pat solution for it.
We have documents that look like this: {
ids : [a, b],
meta:{...}
}
In our system, a process can come along and need to add an id to the ids
list. The ids must be globally unique. The only
We just thought of a funny alternative --- write every entity into one
document. Not necessarily practical in every case, but it should work for
us.
A
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Adam Wolff awo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Adam Wolff awo...@gmail.com wrote:
We just thought of a funny alternative --- write every entity into one
document. Not necessarily practical in every case, but it should work for
us.
A
That's the right way to do it.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Benoit
Hello,
Should I be able to do a redirect from a _list function?
I ask because I've tried defining the following _list function:
function(head, req) {
return {
'code': 301,
'headers': { 'Location': 'http://www.google.com/' }
};
}
And, here's what happens when I try to hit it:
$
My apologies! I just re-read the wiki and saw my answer:
function(doc, req) {
if(doc) {
// regular doc display logic
} else { // document not found
if(req.docId) {
// HANDLE MISSING DOC HERE!!
} else {
// handle unspecified doc id
}
}
}
RTFM-FTW! :^P
On Thu,
gracias paco!
- matt
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Francisco Viramontes p...@freshout.uswrote:
http://gist.github.com/192378
Modified version of the script in
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Regenerating_views_on_update?action=showredirect=RegeneratingViewsOnUpdate
PAco
heh I guess it's already done :)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies! I just re-read the wiki and saw my answer:
function(doc, req) {
if(doc) {
// regular doc display logic
} else { // document not found
if(req.docId) {
Interesting. Can you actually return an HTTP 404 response code though?
--AQ
Aaron Quint
http://www.quirkey.com
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote:
heh I guess it's already done :)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com
I see, but I actually wanted to have something in between, not one IP, not all
IPs.
it is fine, it is a 'high want' on my list.
rgds,
canal
From: Paul Joseph Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
To: user@couchdb.apache.org user@couchdb.apache.org
Sent:
thanks !
Can I use this bulk update to change a field without uploading the full doc:
{
docs: [
{_id: 1, _rev: 1-2089673485, integer: 2},
{_id: 2, _rev: 1-2063452834, integer: 3, string: 3}
]
}
So for doc _id 1, I only change 'integer'; will the rest be kept intact, or
CouchDB
I'm actually unfamiliar with even the POSIX API for binding ranges of
IP's. If you know the mechanics for such things that'd give me a good
starting place for seeing what Erlang has to offer.
Paul
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:15 PM, go canal goca...@yahoo.com wrote:
I see, but I actually wanted to
Sorry, you have to upload the whole doc. You do not have to send
attachments again though.
On Sep 24, 2009 6:14 PM, go canal goca...@yahoo.com wrote:
thanks !
Can I use this bulk update to change a field without uploading the full doc:
{
docs: [
{_id: 1, _rev: 1-2089673485, integer: 2},
So, can anyone give a reason why this _list function shouldn't work?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Should I be able to do a redirect from a _list function?
I ask because I've tried defining the following _list function:
Bit tired here but two thoughts. Theoretically returning a 304 should
work fine I think. The question is what mutation happens when
processing the _list. I'd suggest taking a glance at render.js to see
if maybe you're getting caught by a corner case.
Paul
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:50 PM,
Theoretically returning a 304 should work fine I think.
I thought 304 was for etag/caching validation...?
I'd suggest taking a glance at render.js to see
if maybe you're getting caught by a corner case.
Hm... I'm gonna have to learn more about list functions work to
understand what's going
thanks for confirming, I think it is acceptable, though not ideal.
Just wondering, since we can modify individual field with Futon, why don't we
expose the API ? rgds,
canal
From: Jesse Hallett halle...@gmail.com
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Friday,
26 matches
Mail list logo
