Hi,
I read the book, Wiki and some Blogs about CouchDB,
but there is still a question in my mind.
If a document is in conflict, the application has to resolve it.
But what, if this never happens?
Can the document in conflict still be read and edited?
Or is it unavailable until the conflict is
Hi Jan,
I found some time to look into the code and I have a rough idea on how
this can be implemented. As far as I understand, an attachment is stored
in blocks and then contains data on where those blocks can be found on
disk. The actual length of the block is stored on disk. Therefore, the
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:28:33AM +0100, fana wrote:
I read the book, Wiki and some Blogs about CouchDB,
but there is still a question in my mind.
If a document is in conflict, the application has to resolve it.
But what, if this never happens?
All the conflicting versions remain around,
I am a bit confused about the intended semantics of ?revs_info=true, since
it does not show conflicting revs. Example:
script ---
HOST=http://127.0.0.1:5984
DB=$HOST/conflict_test
EP=$DB/_bulk_docs
curl -s $HOST
curl -sX DELETE $DB
curl -sX PUT $DB
resp=$(curl -sX
Hi
Does CouchDB treat string and number differently ?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Duy Nguyen duynguyen0...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
Does CouchDB treat string and number differently ?
What do you mean? Strings and numbers are different in JSON, if that's
what you mean.
-Andrew
Yes. See the JSON spec: http://json.org/
On Oct 29, 2009 10:11 AM, Duy Nguyen duynguyen0...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
Does CouchDB treat string and number differently ?
Of course this would disable MD5 validation on the skipped bytes; I'm not
sure if anyone has discussed the ramifications. Best,
IIRC, there's something in the spec for Content-MD5 that deals with this.
Paul Davis
On Oct 29, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:28:33AM +0100, fana wrote:
I read the book, Wiki and some Blogs about CouchDB,
but there is still a question in my mind.
If a document is in conflict, the application has to resolve it.
But what, if this never
It only shows the revision history of the current document. Open each
conflict document by revision id using the revs_info=true options to
see it's full history.
-Damien
On Oct 29, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
I am a bit confused about the intended semantics of ?revs_info=true,
On 28 Oct 2009, at 16:22, Vijay Raghunathan wrote:
- what are your top feature requests for future development?
Speed, stability. Rolling the features of the lounge into couch
(especially the smartproxy). Filtered changes (I think this is
scheduled for .11 right?)
They are in 0.10.
Hello,
I read System reserved items start with underscore, ... does not
allow any user-defined property to begin with an underscore. at [1]
which left me curious if the _ rule applies to design doc names?
_design/_foo for example is valid as of .10.0, but is that going to
change?
We intend on
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
We intend on possibly naming document properties #_* would this
cause future conflicts? Any recommendation for a private prefix for
property names within documents? Documents may contain properties that
belong to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
_design/_foo for example is valid as of .10.0, but is that going to
change?
Most interesting. The specific definitions we've used before are generally:
Underscore prefixes are reserved in the root of a document.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Julian Goacher
julian.goac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
With respect to http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Reserved_words: I'm a
developer currently writing an application framework layered over couchdb.
The framework needs to annotate user documents with
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Creating a simple view such as function(doc) { emit(null, doc); },
will fail with subject. This happens when executing both temporary
view or one I create. The database is extremely simple. I think this
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Julian Goacher
julian.goac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
I think this is a slightly different use case though. The framework sits as
a layer between the user and the db; I don't want the user to wrap their
data to use the framework. Rather, I want to annotate a
hi,
i'm lenz from iWantMyName, a New Zealand based domain registrar
targeting the US market and about to launch into the european market.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Michael Miller m...@cloudant.com wrote:
- why did you choose couch?
when we started iwmn we looked around for new stuff -
18 matches
Mail list logo