On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jim Klo jim@sri.com wrote:
I'm not sure I'm following the whole thread, but why are you storing integers
as strings?
If you store them as numbers, they would collate right I think.
Hi Jim,
Can you provide an example?
I am using jquery.couch.js.
In a openDoc() the return key for the _id is named _id.
In a saveDoc() the return key for the _id is named id.
Looking in Firebug at the get and put requests that are beeing sent the
reason seems to be the answer of couchdb to a put
request:
On 05/20/2012 06:16 PM, Alexander Gabriel wrote:
I am using jquery.couch.js.
In a openDoc() the return key for the _id is named _id.
In a saveDoc() the return key for the _id is named id.
Looking in Firebug at the get and put requests that are beeing sent the
reason seems to be the answer of
Hi Jens,
- CouchDB supports OAuth 1.0, not 2.0
- The fields in the replication structure are fine if you want CouchDB to
replicate to CouchDB, but I think in your case you want to OAuth requests
from a client to CouchDB so you will want to sign each request yourself.
- We use the OAuthConsumer
_id and _rev are field names within a document, whereas the non-underscore
versions are copies of those values.
On 20 May 2012 11:35, Goog Cheng googch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/20/2012 06:16 PM, Alexander Gabriel wrote:
I am using jquery.couch.js.
In a openDoc() the return key for the _id
@Martin: Thanks, understanding it will hopefully help me remember.
@Goog:saveDoc() is a function included in jquery.couch.js.
You can use it whenever you reference jquery.couch.js.
To reference it I have this line in the header of the document:
script type=text/javascript
On 05/20/2012 08:26 PM, Alexander Gabriel wrote:
@Martin: Thanks, understanding it will hopefully help me remember.
@Goog:saveDoc() is a function included in jquery.couch.js.
You can use it whenever you reference jquery.couch.js.
To reference it I have this line in the header of the document:
Integers as strings:
[1, 2, 3]
Integers as integers:
[1, 2, 3]
On May 20, 2012 3:37 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jim Klo jim@sri.com wrote:
I'm not sure I'm following the whole thread, but why are you storing
integers as strings?
If
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Keith Gable zi...@ignition-project.com wrote:
Integers as strings:
[1, 2, 3]
Integers as integers:
[1, 2, 3]
Okay, but how does that help with the question at hand?
Very nice! But perhaps you could note that 1.3 will switch from the
simple SHA1 scheme to PBKDF2 with configurable work factor?
B.
On 20 May 2012 21:27, Miles Pomeroy pomeroymi...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote a post about the new features in 1.2.0. Check it out and let
me know if there are any
Thanks. I don't call it out explicitly, but I link to the Jira item in
my second footnote.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Very nice! But perhaps you could note that 1.3 will switch from the
simple SHA1 scheme to PBKDF2 with configurable work factor?
I'm not sure I'm following the whole thread, but why are you storing
integers as strings?
If you store them as numbers, they would collate right I think.
Hi Jim,
Can you provide an example?
I merely provided an example of using integers as integers.
---
Keith Gable
A+ Certified
If you're trying to sort hierarchically using integers as id's, assuming the
id's grow incrementally with time (say you were using local_seq), the arrays
will naturally sort numerically, whereas strings are going to sort
alphanumerically, meaning 2, 3, 22, 33 vs 2, 22, 3,33.
Hence,
[ 1, 2 ]
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Tim Tisdall tisd...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to temporarily open the port for couchdb so I can access futon.
However, I have a large database already in there that I don't want
accessible by the public. If I temporarily move the database_name.couch
file from
Yeah, likely the best way to undo this would be to use filtered
replication to a local db and then rename the .couch files and reboot
to get it swapped over.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jim Klo jim@sri.com wrote:
Not sure how many docs you have, but can you filter replicate the good
15 matches
Mail list logo