If the number of unique thread_ids in a given result set is not huge you might
consider a _list function that suppresses rows where the thread_id matches one
that you've already sent out the wire.
Adam
On Apr 22, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
> I'm building a messaging app where me
Here's a possibility. You want to replicate behind the proxy and on the
other side of the proxy. A global proxy setting breaks that. From:
Steven Barlow
Sent: 4/24/2013 9:12 AM
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: _replicator database and proxies
Thanks for the comments.
I appreciate that each
I think that depends on the setting of max_replication_retry_count in config.
On 24 April 2013 11:27, Steven Barlow wrote:
> That did occur to me too. Perhaps it's a viable solution, but it
> doesn't seem very elegant.
>
> Also (and I haven't investigated thoroughly, so I don't know the
> answer)
That did occur to me too. Perhaps it's a viable solution, but it
doesn't seem very elegant.
Also (and I haven't investigated thoroughly, so I don't know the
answer) I'm not totally clear on whether the failed replications
(those in error state due to invalid proxy config for the current
situation)
Hm, why not have a replication document for each of those two
situations? One with proxy, one without?
B.
On 24 April 2013 10:11, Steven Barlow wrote:
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> I appreciate that each replication document is independent. I guess
> I'm questioning whether the proxy configurat
Thanks for the comments.
I appreciate that each replication document is independent. I guess
I'm questioning whether the proxy configuration is typically an
attribute of the individual replication entity, rather than being a
"system-wide" connection configuration. I'm struggling to envisage a
scen
Hmm?
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013, till wrote:
> Do you know email? :)
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Also, I think Till has an Ubuntu PPA somewhere. Till?
>
>
> On 20 April 2013 11:24, Noah Slater 'cvml', 'nsla...@apache.org');>
> > wrote:
>
> Please note tha
Do you know email? :)
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Also, I think Till has an Ubuntu PPA somewhere. Till?
>
>
> On 20 April 2013 11:24, Noah Slater (mailto:nsla...@apache.org)> wrote:
> > Please note that I am getting a MAILER-DAEMON error from g...@debian.hu
>
Q: "Why is the proxy configuration part of the replication document at all?
A: Because each replication document is an independent entity.
Making it global works for your case but not the general case. Why is
your proxy configuration changing so rapidly?
B.
On 24 April 2013 08:31, Steven wrote
OK, please excuse the bump, but really? No takers on this one?
I'm surprised if I'm the only person encountering this situation. Is nobody
else working on a system with replication to laptop devices that use
multiple connections?
Here's my biggest confusion: Why is the proxy configuration part of
Stanley, that ticket is still in an "unresolved" state, so I am guessing
not.
Do you have a patch that fixes it? I can help you get it applied and we can
ship it in the next release.
On 12 April 2013 23:46, Stanley Iriele wrote:
> A little late for mebut has the problem with rewrites forma
Also, I think Till has an Ubuntu PPA somewhere. Till?
On 20 April 2013 11:24, Noah Slater wrote:
> Please note that I am getting a MAILER-DAEMON error from g...@debian.hu.
>
>
> On 17 April 2013 17:42, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> The Ubuntu package is unmaintained but pulled directly from Debian.
12 matches
Mail list logo
