Damien:
I've haven't seen you being particularly helpful, but then I haven't been
reading your all your posts very closely
either. However, you've definitely been disrespectful to others and if you
wish participate in this community I
suggest you so in a respectful manner.
Basically im doing
For the sake of discussion:
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/trunk/share/www/script/couch.js
[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/trunk/share/www/script/jquery.couch.js
These client libs were mentioned in the Futon Improvements thread which was
forked to this jQuery
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 08:47:15PM +1000, cinnebar wrote:
There is a request for the development of Futon. Futon uses the built-in
jQuery libraries which means that it is jQuery dependent.
Could you clarify? A request for…?
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Could you clarify? A request for…?
Good gawd prettyboy where were you when they were handing out the smarts ?
Development request refers to Pauls post titled Futon Improvements ...maybe
its closed already in @dev?
...either way for you cut and paste follows:
fromPaul Davis
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:53:38AM +1000, cinnebar wrote:
Could you clarify? A request for…?
Good gawd prettyboy where were you when they were handing out the smarts ?
Less of the fucking attitude please.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:01:59AM +1000, cinnebar wrote:
Less of the fucking attitude please.
soz no offence intended hope it was helpful
That's okay prettyboy, your berkish behaviour is amusing me.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
If you are not familiar with jQuery already, check it out. Although if
you really want to appreciate it, I suggest you attempt to do* without
it for a while first.
Thanks for the advice. I have done a lot of front end dev and the way the
libraries like jquery balance across browsers is a
cinnebar, I hope you are sincere in your desire to help. I've haven't
seen you being particularly helpful, but then I haven't been reading
your all your posts very closely either. However, you've definitely
been disrespectful to others and if you wish participate in this
community I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:22 PM, cinnebar merz.onl...@gmail.com wrote:
a) jQuery is a very popular js lib, I don't see how that is a deterrent.
I am going to try to address this and it may take a few posts/emails.
Firstly jquery is a useful, popular and all round great framework (perhaps
Building yet another abstraction so we could swap jQuery with Prototype,
etc doesn't make
sense to me.
Im not convinced that building a loose coupled jquery Futon is the way to go
but I am interested in the discussion.
On Fri, Sep 11, 14:22, cinnebar wrote:
Implementation of any new features in Futon immediately requires at least
being down with jquery or otherwise being down with js and ajax with jquery
on top.
The project I am involved with is being built with its own js component lib
to avoid longterm
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:35 AM, cinnebar merz.onl...@gmail.com wrote:
Building yet another abstraction so we could swap jQuery with Prototype,
etc doesn't make
sense to me.
Im not convinced that building a loose coupled jquery Futon is the way to go
but I am interested in the discussion.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:22:46PM +1000, cinnebar wrote:
Implementation of any new features in Futon immediately requires at least
being down with jquery or otherwise being down with js and ajax with jquery
on top.
Yeps, sure. But hacking on the build systems requires knowledge of the GNU
Hey,
Should we move this over to dev@ now?
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Hi, I've been reading...
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:35 AM, cinnebar merz.onl...@gmail.com wrote:
Im not convinced that building a loose coupled jquery Futon is the way to
go
but I am interested in the discussion.
I'm unclear on this point. Subtract jQuery for a moment. Are you
interested
I would be very disappointed to see any management,
demo, or whatever *human interface* be tightly coupled.
definitely
I'm unclear on this point. Subtract jQuery for a moment. Are you
interested in a loosely coupled Futon? Or no?
no
I just wanted to clarify a statement I made in the thread that this thread
stems from:
problem oriented development is not the only option
Of course users should be encouraged to come to users@ and look for help
with anything CouchDB(ish) but as wide scoped structural optimization is
also an
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:10:55AM +1000, cinnebar wrote:
There appears to be a grey area regarding what is dev@ appropriate
discussion and what is users@ appropriate that pivots on what is core
CouchDb and what is not.
There are no hard and fast rules, and I don't think we need any.
Should we move this over to dev@ now? is the question
Also im uncertain if it is entirely evident from the discussion but I think
this is the critical element:
I've got a couple ideas for how to give
Futon an extra bit of polish but I have no AJAX-fu.
From where I am standing it appears the
I am totally puzzled ...
Futon is a simple management app built with, among other things,
jQuery. Abstracting Futon to allow switching of multiple client-side
libraries seems like a strange thing to focus on.
Anyone making a web application these days MUST be using a
cross-browser library of
Hi :)
On 10 Sep 2009, at 03:33, cinnebar wrote:
I am working with a group on a full featured ERP that proposes to
index/store data AND scripts in one or multiple json db files, perhaps
outputting function sets from json document/s to .js (for example)
file/s
serverside maybe in a cache
Maybe the problem is that the JavaScript interface library that ships with
CouchDB depends on jQuery. If that is the case and if it only relies on
jQuery for XMLHttpRequest support then it should be reasonably easy to
factor out.
On the other hand a jQuery dependency in Futon is a good thing,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi :)
On 10 Sep 2009, at 03:33, cinnebar wrote:
I am working with a group on a full featured ERP that proposes to
index/store data AND scripts in one or multiple json db files, perhaps
outputting function sets from json
a) jQuery is a very popular js lib, I don't see how that is a deterrent.
I am going to try to address this and it may take a few posts/emails.
Firstly jquery is a useful, popular and all round great framework (perhaps
this is stating the obvious).
The discussion that this thread stems from
Been watching this thread and as a user of couchdb
(http://www.pcapr.net) and not a maintainer or a contributor I have
the following comments.
jQuery *is* the way (my personal opinion) to interact with the browser
and html and ajax and all the jazz. document.getElementById is so
passe' (Yes, I've
cinnebar wrote:
a) jQuery is a very popular js lib, I don't see how that is a deterrent.
I am going to try to address this and it may take a few posts/emails.
Firstly jquery is a useful, popular and all round great framework (perhaps
this is stating the obvious).
The discussion that this
26 matches
Mail list logo
